BackgroundThe recovery of diaphragmatic function is vital for successful extubation from mechanical ventilation. Recent studies have detected diaphragm atrophy in ventilated adults by using ultrasound, but no similar report has been conducted in children. In the current study, we hypothesized that mechanically ventilated children may also develop diaphragm atrophy and diaphragmatic dysfunction.Materials and methodsChildren who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit and were newly intubated for mechanical ventilation were enrolled into this prospective case–control study. Diaphragm ultrasound assessments were performed daily to evaluate diaphragmatic function in the enrolled children until their discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit. Diaphragm thickness and the diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) were measured through these assessments.ResultsA total of 31 patients were enrolled, and overall, 1389 ultrasound assessments were performed. Immediately after intubation, the initial diaphragm thickness and DTF were measured to be 1.94 ± 0.44 mm and 25.85% ± 3.29%, respectively. In the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation, diaphragm thickness and the DTF decreased substantially and decreased gradually thereafter. After extubation, the DTF was significantly different between the successful and failed extubation groups (P < 0.001), and a DTF value of <17% was associated with extubation failure.ConclusionsDiaphragm ultrasound is a noninvasive method for measuring diaphragmatic function in mechanically ventilated children. In this study, significant diaphragm atrophy and a decreased DTF were observed within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. The recovery of diaphragm thickness and the DTF may be a potential predictor of successful extubation from mechanical ventilation.
BACKGROUND:The functional status and outcomes in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) are often limited by poor endurance and pulmonary mechanics, which result from the primary diseases or prolonged time bedridden. We evaluate the impact of exercise training on pulmonary mechanics, physical functional status, and hospitalization outcomes in PMV patients. METHODS: Twenty-seven subjects with PMV in our respiratory care center (RCC) were divided randomly into an exercise training group (n ؍ 12) and a control group (n ؍ 15). The exercise program comprised 10 sessions of exercise training. The measurement of pulmonary mechanics and physical functional status (Functional Independence Measurement and Barthel index) were performed pre-study and post-study. The hospitalization outcomes included: days of mechanical ventilation, hospitalization days, and weaning and mortality rates during RCC stay. RESULTS: The training group had significant improvement in tidal volume (143.6 mL vs 192.5 mL, P ؍ .02) and rapid shallow breathing index after training (162.2 vs 110.6, P ؍ .009). No significant change was found in the control group except respiratory rate. Both groups had significant improvement in functional status during the study. However, the training group had greater changes in FIM score than the control group (44.6 vs 34.2, P ؍ .024). The training group also had shorter RCC stay and higher weaning and survival rates than the control group, although no statistical difference was found. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with PMV in our RCC demonstrated significant improvement in pulmonary mechanics and functional status after exercise training. The application of exercise training may be helpful for PMV patients to improve hospitalization outcomes.
Decreasing the frequency of ventilator circuit changes from every 2 days to once per week is safe and cost-effective in neonates requiring prolonged intubation for more than 1 week.
BACKGROUND: Muscle atrophy and deconditioning are common complications in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). There are few studies that reviewed the effects of electrical muscle stimulation in this population. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of electrical muscle stimulation on muscle function and hospitalization outcomes in subjects with PMV. METHODS: Subjects on mechanical ventilation for >21 d were randomly assigned to the electrical muscle stimulation group (n ؍ 16) or the control group (n ؍ 17). The electrical muscle stimulation group received daily muscle electrical stimulation for 30 min/session for 10 d. The measurement of muscle strength (by medical research council [MRC] scale), leg circumference, and physical functional status (by Functional Independence Measure [FIM] scores) were performed before and after completion of the study. The length of stay in respiratory care center of subjects were recorded. RESULTS: After electrical muscle stimulation, there was no difference in pulmonary function between the electrical muscle stimulation and control groups. Significantly increased in MRC points was found in the electrical muscle stimulation group after intervention (2 [1-7] points vs 2 [1-3.5] points, respectively, P ؍ .034). No difference in MRC points was found between baseline and post-measurement in the control group (1[1-2] points vs 1[1-2.5] points, respectively, P > .99). At the end of the study, leg circumference in control group significantly decreased when compared with baseline (47.5 ؎ 8.3 cm vs 44.6 ؎ 5.7 cm, respectively, P ؍ .004) and remained unchanged in the EMS group. However, no significant differences were found between the electrical muscle stimulation and control groups. There was no difference in physical functional status and hospital stay between the electrical muscle stimulation and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical muscle stimulation enhanced muscle strength in subjects who received PMV. Electrical muscle stimulation can be considered a preventive strategy for muscle weakness in patients who receive PMV. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02227810.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.