Knee surgeries are the most commonly performed joint surgeries in the modern world, which help maintain the quality of life by improving joint functions. These include open trauma, sports injury, or joint replacement surgeries. Among various available regional analgesia options for knee surgeries, the goal is to choose motor-sparing, opioid-sparing, and procedure-specific modalities. Therefore, it is essential to know the complex anatomy of the knee joint, essential steps of various surgical procedures, and innervations of the pain-generating structures for a particular surgery. Background knowledge of all these essentials helps select the most appropriate regional analgesia technique for knee surgeries.

The clavicle is the most frequently fractured bone in humans. General anesthesia with or without Regional Anesthesia (RA) is most frequently used for clavicle surgeries due to its complex innervation. Many RA techniques, alone or in combination, have been used for clavicle surgeries. These include interscalene block, cervical plexus (superficial and deep) blocks, SCUT (supraclavicular nerve + selective upper trunk) block, and pectoral nerve blocks (PEC I and PEC II). The clavipectoral fascial plane block is also a safe and simple option and replaces most other RA techniques due to its lack of side effects like phrenic nerve palsy or motor block of the upper limb. We present a comprehensive review of anatomy and RA techniques of clavicle surgeries. This review will help readers understand the functional anatomy and nature of clavicle fractures, and apply an algorithmic approach to procedure-specific blocks for complexly innervated structures like clavicle.

No abstract

Scapular fractures are very rare, and those requiring surgical interventions are even rarer. Most scapula surgeries are done under general anesthesia with or without the regional anesthesia (RA) technique as an adjunct. Since scapular innervation is complicated, a thorough review of the relevant anatomy is warranted. In this RAPM educational article, we aimed to summarize the target nerves and blocks needed to optimize analgesia or even to provide surgical anesthesia for scapula surgeries. In this review, we are describing an algorithmic “identify-select-combine” approach, which enables the anesthesiologist to understand detailed innervation of the scapula and to obtain a procedure-specific RA technique. Procedure-specific RA would probably be the way forward for defining future RA practices.

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a life-changing joint surgery that improves health-related quality of life and functional status. Patients in need of this surgery mostly belong to the geriatric age group with limited functional reserves and multiple co-morbidities requiring utmost perioperative care with the most suitable analgesic modalities. Regional analgesia (RA) should provide effective analgesia while allowing early mobility, reduced opioid consumption, and early discharge. Dual subsartorial block (DSB) is a novel procedure-specific, motor-sparing, and opioid-sparing RA technique for TKA surgeries. Our study compared the analgesic efficacy of the two different combinations of volumes used in DSB. Methods: This prospective randomized comparative study included patients between 25-75 years of age of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-II grades who underwent an elective cemented unilateral total knee replacement performed via medial approaches under neuraxial anesthesia. A total of 104 patients were divided into two equal groups based on the local anesthetic (LA) volumes (Group A 10/20 ml and Group B 20/10 ml) used in the DSB. Postoperative pain scores (using a visual analog scale) and quadriceps strengths (using neurological exam), and opioid consumption were measured at regular intervals till discharge. Results: Most patients (71.2%) remained pain-free and comfortable until discharge, while 28.8% complained of pain within 12 hours of DSB. Mean quadriceps strength remained almost normal (4-5/5) until the discharge with no incidences of buckling or fall in either group. Over time, the postoperative trend between the groups showed a significant difference for dynamic pain (p = 0.002) and quadriceps strength (p = <0.001). There was an insignificant difference (p = 0.161) between the groups regarding opioid consumption, with the median oral morphine equivalent of zero in both groups. Discussion: The effective analgesic coverage of DSB is based on the involvement of all innervations of the procedure-specific pain generators of TKR surgeries. The specific focus on selective sensory innervations and the type/volume of the LA used makes DSB a motor-sparing RA alternative that facilitates early mobility and discharge. It can provide effective postoperative analgesia without compromising the motor strength of the quadriceps muscle when administered in either 10/20 or 20/10 volumes.