Background Currently, there is still controversy about the differential changes in corneal endothelium function and morphology after phacoemulsification between Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and non-Diabetes Mellitus (non-DM) patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of phacoemulsification on the corneal endothelium in DM and non-DM patients. Methods Databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 1, 2011 and December 25, 2021. The weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval were used to estimate the outcomes of statistical analyses performed. Results Thirteen studies involving 1744 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. No significant difference was observed in the central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficients of variation (CV), or hexagonal cell percentage (HCP) between the DM and non-DM groups (CCT: P = 0.91; ECD: P = 0.07; CV: P = 0.06; HCP: P = 0.09) preoperatively. The CCT was significantly thicker in the DM group at 1 month (P = 0.003) and 3 months (P = 0.0009) postoperatively, and there was no significant difference at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.26) than non-DM group. The CV was significantly higher and HCP was significantly lower in the DM group at 1 month (CV:P < 0.0001, HCP: P = 0.002), with no significant difference at 3 months (CV: P = 0.09, HCP: P = 0.36) and 6 months (CV: P = 0.32, HCP: P = 0.36) postoperatively than non-DM group. DM patients had lower ECD than non-DM patients at all postoperative time points (1 month, 3 months: P < 0.00001, 6 months: P < 0.0001). Conclusions The influence of phacoemulsification on corneal endothelial damage is greater in diabetic patients. Moreover, the recovery of corneal endothelial function and morphology is delayed in these patients. Clinicians should be more attentive to the corneal health of DM patients when considering phacoemulsification.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.