Background
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) accounts for 50% of lung cancers, with high mortality and poor prognosis. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plays a vital role in the progression of tumors. Cuproptosis is a newly discovered form of cell death that is highly investigated. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of cuproptosis-related lncRNA signature in clinical prognosis prediction and immunotherapy and the relationship with drug sensitivity.
Material and methods
Genomic and clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, and cuproptosis-related genes were obtained from cuproptosis-related studies. The prognostic signature was constructed by co-expression analysis and Cox regression analysis. Patients were divided into high and low risk groups, and then, a further series of model validations were carried out to assess the prognostic value of the signature. Subsequently, lncRNAs were analyzed for gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Enrichment (KEGG), immune-related functions, and tumor mutation burden (TMB). Finally, we used tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithms on immune escape and immunotherapy of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs, thereby identifying its sensitivity toward potential drugs for LUAD.
Results
A total of 16 cuproptosis-related lncRNAs were obtained, and a prognostic signature was developed. We found that high-risk patients had worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and higher mortality. Independent prognostic analyses, ROC, C-index, and nomogram showed that the cuproptosis-related lncRNAs can accurately predict the prognosis of patients. The nomogram and heatmap showed a distinct distribution of the high- and low-risk cuproptosis-related lncRNAs. Enrichment analysis showed that the biological functions of lncRNAs are associated with tumor development. We also found that immune-related functions, such as antiviral activity, were suppressed in high-risk patients who had mutations in oncogenes. OS was poorer in patients with high TMB. TIDE algorithms showed that high-risk patients have a greater potential for immune escape and less effective immunotherapy.
Conclusion
To conclude, the 16 cuproptosis-related lncRNAs can accurately predict the prognosis of patients with LUAD and may provide new insights into clinical applications and immunotherapy.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rapidly developing digestive tract carcinoma. The prognosis of patients and side effects caused by clinical treatment should be better improved. Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering was performed using 109 homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-related of HCC genes from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Limma was applied to analyze subtype differences. Immune scores and clinical characteristics of different subtypes were compared. An HRD signature were built with least absolute shrinkage operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox analysis. Performance of the signature system was then assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We identified two molecular subtypes (C1 and C2), with C2 showing a significantly better prognosis than C1. C1 contained 3623 differentially expressed genes. A 4-gene prognostic signature for HCC was established, and showed a high predicting accuracy in validation sets, entire TCGA data set, HCCDB18 and GSE14520 queues. Moreover, the risk score was validated as an independent prognostic marker for HCC. Our research identified two molecular subtypes of HCC, and proposed a novel scoring system for evaluating the prognosis of HCC in clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.