Fax: +31-50-3613763 - re-intervention after orthotopic liver transplantationAbstract Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice in selected patients with end-stage liver disease. Postoperative complications often require surgical re-intervention. This study is a retrospective single-centre study to assess the incidence and type of surgical re-intervention during the in-hospital period after liver transplantation and to identify predictors of this re-intervention. From 1994 to 2002, 231 consecutive adult liver transplantations were performed. Re-intervention was classified as biliary, vascular, bleeding, septicaemia, re-transplantation or as miscellaneous. One hundred and thirty-nine surgical re-interventions were performed in 79 of 231 patients (34%). Septicaemia (44%) and 'bleeding (27%) were the most frequent indications for re-intervention, followed by biliary (10%) reintervention. Vascular re-intervention, re-transplantation, and reintervention for miscellaneous reasons, were performed in 7% each. Of all analysed variables (gender, age, diagnosis, acute liver failure, ChildPugh classification, Karnofsky score, previous abdominal surgery, creatinine clearance, prothrombin time, anti-thrombin, platelet count, surgical technique, cold ischaemia time, warm ischaemia time, functional anhepatic time, anatomic anhepatic time, revascularisation time, year of transplantation, aprotinin administration, transfused platelet concentrate, and red blood cell transfusion requirements), only the number of transfused red blood cell concentrates (RBCs) was identified as a predictor of surgical re-intervention. Median RBC transfusion requirement during liver transplantation was 2.9 1 (range 0-18.8 1) in the re-intervention group compared with 1.5 1 (range 0-13.4 1) in the non-re-intervention group (P < 0.001). This study revealed intraoperative blood loss as the main determinant of early surgical re-intervention after liver transplantation and emphasises the need for further attempts to control blood loss during liver transplantation.

Objectives To determine whether a transverse incision is an alternative to a midline incision in terms of incisional hernia incidence, surgical site infection, postoperative pain, hospital stay and cosmetics in cholecystectomy. Summary background data Incisional hernias after midline incision are commonly underestimated but probably complicate between 2 and 20% of all abdominal wall closures. The midline incision is the preferred incision for surgery of the upper abdomen despite evidence that alternatives, such as the lateral paramedian and transverse incision, exist and might reduce the rate of incisional hernia. A RCT was preformed in the pre-laparoscopic cholecystectomy era the data of which were never published. Methods One hundred and Wfty female patients were randomly allocated to cholecystectomy through midline or transverse incision. Early complications, the duration to discharge and the in-hospital use of analgesics was noted. Patients returned to the surgical outpatient clinic for evaluation of the cosmetic results of the scar and to evaluate possible complications such as Wstula, wound dehiscence and incisional hernia after a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Results Two percent (1/60) of patients that had undergone the procedure through a transverse incision presented with an incisional hernia as opposed to 14% (9/63) of patients from the midline incision group (P = 0.017). Transverse incisions were found to be signiWcantly shorter than midline incisions and associated with more pleasing appearance. More patients having undergone a midline incision, reported pain on day one, two and three postoperatively than patients from the transverse group. The use of analgesics did not diVer between the two groups. Conclusions In light of our results a transverse incision should, if possible, be considered as the preferred incision in acute and elective surgery of the upper abdomen when laparoscopic surgery is not an option.

Besides the conventional laboratory tests, thromboelastography (TEG) is used to monitor hemostasis during liver transplantation. A previous pilot study suggested a beneficial effect of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) on transfusion requirements in liver transplantation. In the present study, we assess the effects of rFVIIa on coagulation variables and TEG. In six study patients, the prothrombin time (PT), the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and TEG variables [reaction time (r), kinetic time (k), or clot formation time, alpha angle (alpha), and maximal amplitude (MA)] were recorded before and after the administration of a bolus of 80 microg/kg rFVIIa. These patients were compared with six controls who did not receive rFVIIa. In contrast with the control group, a significant shortening of PT (P = 0.028) and aPTT (P = 0.028), r (P = 0.046) and k (P = 0.043) values, and a significant incline of the alpha angle (P = 0.028) were noticed after injection of rFVIIa, whereas MA increased not significantly (P = 0.075). rFVIIa rapidly improved coagulation variables in liver transplant patients including PT and aPTT. Of the TEG variables, r, k and alpha angle significantly improved, and MA showed a trend to increase. These data suggest that rFVIIa not only influences the speed of clot formation, but also the physical properties of the clot, which cannot be detected by routine coagulation tests.

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice in selected patients with end-stage liver disease. Postoperative complications often require surgical re-intervention. This study is a retrospective single-centre study to assess the incidence and type of surgical re-intervention during the in-hospital period after liver transplantation and to identify predictors of this re-intervention. From 1994 to 2002, 231 consecutive adult liver transplantations were performed. Re-intervention was classified as biliary, vascular, bleeding, septicaemia, re-transplantation or as miscellaneous. One hundred and thirty-nine surgical re-interventions were performed in 79 of 231 patients (34%). Septicaemia (44%) and bleeding (27%) were the most frequent indications for re-intervention, followed by biliary (10%) re-intervention. Vascular re-intervention, re-transplantation, and re-intervention for miscellaneous reasons, were performed in 7% each. Of all analysed variables (gender, age, diagnosis, acute liver failure, Child-Pugh classification, Karnofsky score, previous abdominal surgery, creatinine clearance, prothrombin time, anti-thrombin, platelet count, surgical technique, cold ischaemia time, warm ischaemia time, functional anhepatic time, anatomic anhepatic time, revascularisation time, year of transplantation, aprotinin administration, transfused platelet concentrate, and red blood cell transfusion requirements), only the number of transfused red blood cell concentrates (RBCs) was identified as a predictor of surgical re-intervention. Median RBC transfusion requirement during liver transplantation was 2.9 l (range 0-18.8 l) in the re-intervention group compared with 1.5 l (range 0-13.4 l) in the non-re-intervention group (P<0.001). This study revealed intraoperative blood loss as the main determinant of early surgical re-intervention after liver transplantation and emphasises the need for further attempts to control blood loss during liver transplantation.

BackgroundMajority burn mortality prognostic scores were developed and validated in western populations. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and identify possible risk factors which may be used to predict burns mortality in a local Malaysian burns intensive care unit. The secondary objective was to validate the five well known burn prognostic scores (Baux score, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) score, Ryan score, Belgium Outcome Burn Injury (BOBI) score and revised Baux score) to predict burn mortality prediction.MethodsPatients that were treated at the Hospital Sultan Ismail’s Burns Intensive Care (BICU) unit for acute burn injuries between 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2017 were included. Risk factors to predict in-patient burn mortality were gender, age, mechanism of injury, total body surface area burn (TBSA), inhalational injury, mechanical ventilation, presence of tracheotomy, time from of burn injury to BICU admission and initial centre of first emergency treatment was administered. These variables were analysed using univariate and multivariate analysis for the outcomes of death. All patients were scored retrospectively using the five-burn mortality prognostic scores. Predictive ability for burn mortality was analysed using the area under receiver operating curve (AUROC).ResultsA total of 525 patients (372 males and 153 females) with mean age of 34.5 ± 14.6 years were included. There were 463 survivors and 62 deaths (11.8% mortality rate). The outcome of the primary objective showed that amongst the burn mortality risk factors that remained after multivariate analysis were older age (p = 0.004), wider TBSA burn (p < 0.001) and presence of mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). Outcome of secondary objective showed good AUROC value for the prediction of burn death for all five burn prediction scores (Baux score; AUROC:0.9, ABSI score; AUROC:0.92, Ryan score; AUROC:0.87, BOBI score; AUROC:0.91 and revised Baux score; AUROC:0.94). The revised Baux score had the best AUROC value of 0.94 to predict burns mortality.ConclusionCurrent study evaluated and identified older age, total body surface area burns, and mechanical ventilation as significant predictors of burn mortality. In addition, the revised Baux score was the most accurate burn mortality risk score to predict mortality in a Malaysian burn’s population.