Virtually every sandstone reservoir contains significant amounts of shale. Although the sand/shale sequence in the wells may be known, a reliable reservoir description must define quantitatively the lateral continuity of the shale, the shale distribution in unsampled areas, and the effects of the shales on transport properties. This paper presents statistical techniques by which the lateral continuity and spatial disposition of shales can be estimated. These techniques rely on shale statistics from the wells and outcrop statistics from appropriate depositional environments. The resulting shale description can be conditioned to conform with the observations of the wells. The subsequent discretizing of the reservoir into gridblocks for numerical simulation yields large elemental units that usually contain both sand and shale. The paper concludes by showing how the permeability and paper concludes by showing how the permeability and porosity may be estimated from the disposition of shales porosity may be estimated from the disposition of shales within each block. Introduction Shales either divide reservoirs into separate hydraulic units, or, if the shales are discontinuous, set a tortuous environment in which fluid transport occurs. While continuous correlatable shales are handled with ease in reservoir simulation models, discontinuous shales present a problem. This study is concerned with such present a problem. This study is concerned with such uncorrelatable discontinuous shales in sandstone reservoirs. The primary source of information about shales is, as with virtually all reservoir properties, the wells. An empirical distribution of shale thicknesses can he inferred from an observed sand/shale sequence. Unless the well spacing is extremely dense, nothing is revealed about the shale's lateral dimensions. A secondary source of information is visual studies on shale dimensions in outcrops of ancient sediments. Once the depositional environment is identified by the geologist, outcrop statistics from a depositional environment similar to the one to be simulated are used for the assignment of lateral shale dimensions. Since we are concerned here with uncorrelatable or stochastic shales, the shales are assumed to be randomly distributed in space. This means that the shale dimensions and the coordinates of the shale centers are random, independent statistical events. This paper describes a shale management procedure that handles sampling of the empirical statistics, generates shale coordinates, and maintains control such that conditioning at the wells is achieved. Conditioning means that the fraction of shale and the vertical succession of sand and shale observed in a well are identical to that in a synthetic description. Finally, when a user-defined grid system is superimposed on the resulting description, the procedure calculates effective porosities and permeabilities for each gridblock. Definition Four scales of averaging volume can be recognized for porous media averages: microscopic (the scale of only a porous media averages: microscopic (the scale of only a few pores), macroscopic (the size of conventional core plugs), megascopic (the size of large gridblocks in field plugs), megascopic (the size of large gridblocks in field models), and gigascopic (total formation or regional scale). These concepts are illustrated in Fig. 1a. As discussed by Bear, porous-media transport equations usually are based on the continuum approach. This means that the actual porous medium is replaced by a fictitious continuum. Physical properties and dependent variables are averages over elemental physical volumes constituting the continuum. The suggested distinction among four scales is necessary because measurements on one scale are not necessarily applicable on another scale (Fig. 1b). In particular, measurements on cores, by which intrinsic sand properties are found, cannot be used readily for megascopic blocks, which include gross textural differences such as sand and shales. This discrepancy is particularly noticeable in numerical reservoir simulation particularly noticeable in numerical reservoir simulation where fluid flow equations are formulated on a macroscale but are frequently solved on a megascale. Shales are generally recognized by geologists as fine-grained, indurated sedimentary rocks with finely laminated structure. They are believed to be a lithification product of muddy sediment, of any origin, and the finely laminated texture is related to orientation of micaceous clay mineral constituents. For our purposes, the term "shale" includes shale laminae, shale streaks, and massive shales. Two shale types are distinguished. The definitions are based on whether the dimensions and spatial disposition of the shales are known. Stochastic shales cannot be correlated between wells and appear to be scattered randomly within the sand matrix (Fig. 2a). Deterministic shales are continuous between observation points. There is no uncertainty associated with their existence and lateral continuity (Fig. 2b). Most reservoirs are hybrid with respect to shales in that both deterministic and stochastic shales coexist; however, the occurrence of stochastic shales clearly becomes more prevalent with large well spacings. SPEJ P. 447
Summary We present a two-stage stochastic model that caters to the large-scalegeological heterogeneities resulting from different rock types and the inherentspatial variability of rock properties. The suggested approach combines severalelements from a variety of models, methods, and algorithms that have emergedduring the last few years. This twostage procedure can be used to generateseveral geologically sound realizations of a reservoir in an efficient manner. Stage 1 preserves the important geological architecture, while Stage 2 providessmall-scale variability in the rock properties. At both stages, the stochasticmodels are conditional on the actual values observed in wells. Hence, everyrealization honors the observations. An example from a highly heterogeneous North Sea reservoir, deposited in an upper shore-face environment illustratesapplication of the model. Introduction As a result of high costs in offshore areas like the North Sea, only aminimum of exploration and appraisal wells can be justified before importantfield development decisions are made. The use of oversimplified geologicalmodels based on data from a limited number of widely spaced wells is probablyone of the most important reasons probably one of the most important reasonsfor the failures in predicting field performance. Oversimplification and theuse of performance. Oversimplification and the use of unrealistic geologicalmodels partly results from the paucity of well data but also results from theinappropriate use of available data. Experience shows, for example, that linearinterpolation of petrophysical characteristics between wells some kilometersapart usually will not give a realistic image of the heterogeneity required topredict fluid flow. To give a realistic description of the point-to-pointvariation, we resort to point-to-point variation, we resort to stochasticmodels and simulation. A reservoir is intrinsically deterministic. It exists, and its propertiesand features are potentially measurable at all scales. A potentially measurableat all scales. A reservoir is the product of many complex processes(sedimentation, erosion, burial, processes (sedimentation, erosion, burial, compaction, diagenesis, etc.) that operate over millions of years. Why, then, do we have to apply stochastic modeling? Haldorsen and Damsleth list thefollowing reasons:the incomplete information about a reservoir'sdimensions, internal architecture, and its rock-property variability at allscales;the complex spatial disposition of reservoir building blocks orfacies;the difficult-to-capture rock-property variability and variabilitystructure with spatial position and direction;the unknown position anddirection;the unknown relationships between the property value and thevolume of rock used for averaging (the scale problem);the relativeabundance of static (point values along the well for kH, Sw, and seismicdata) over dynamic (time-dependent effects, how the rock architecture affects arecovery process, etc.) reservoir data; andconvenience and speed--handdrawing reservoir architectur and point-value realizations in three-dimensionsis a very difficult and time-consuming process. The phenomena or variables that we normally describe with stochastic modelsare those that influence the amount, position, accessibility, and flow offluids through reservoirs. Thus, stochastic modeling or simulation in thiscontext usually refers to the generation of synthetic geological architectureand/or property fields in one, two, or three dimensions. The differentrealizations are conditioned to observations and possess a number of otherdesirable reservoir/geological features that should provide an improved basisfor recovery predictions. In addition, the uncertainty and risk associated withdifferent development options can be quantified better Dubrule gives a very good review of stochastic models for reservoirdescription, while Weber and van Geuns discuss the problem from a geologist'spoint of view, problem from a geologist's point of view, including some of thepossible pitfalls. Several authors present valuable contributions to the theoryand applications of stochastic modeling within the petroleum industry. Two-Stage Model To mimic reality, heterogeneity must be accounted for because it is one ofthe most important factors governing fluid flow. A number of differentapproaches exist for the stochastic modeling of heterogeneities. The choice oftechnique depends on (1) the objective and scale of the study, (2) theavailable input data, (3) the theoretical skills of the people involved, and(4) the software available. The goal is to improve the evaluation of theproduction capacity of the field by introducing small- and/or large-scaleheterogeneities into the reservoir description. Discrete vs. Continuous Models. The distinction between two main classes ofstochastic models (discrete and continuous) is convenient. A finerclassification of the discrete models has been proposed. Discrete models weredeveloped to describe geological features of a discrete nature (e.g., locationsof sand in fluvial depositional environments or locations of shales suspendedin sands). JPT P. 402
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.