The aim of the paper is an accurate histologic description and illustration of those liver lesions that are usually summarized under the heading of "hepatic tumors and related subjects". For in some cases it may be unclear or at least controversial, whether the individual lesion is indeed an autonomous neoplasia or a malformation, regeneration or hyperplasia, the indifferent master term of neoformation is introduced, based on the fact that all of them are characterized by a cellular multiplication. According to common definitory practice the survey distinguishes between mesenchymal (angiomatous and non angiomatous) and epithelial neoformations. Among the latter hepatocellular and cholangiocellular types are distinguished, the criterium for differentiation being a phenomenological one, which is by no means identical with a histogenetical statement. The definition of subgroups mostly adheres to current nomenclatory usage; only occasionally--in the group of endothelial tumors--a novel term is employed, in view of brevity and coordination with the overall system of neoformations.
How well can non-native length contrasts for vowels and for consonants be perceived and is one type more difficult than the other? Three listener groups (native Italian and German as well as advanced German learners of Italian) performed a speeded same–different task involving vocalic and consonantal length contrasts as well as segmental contrasts as controls. Phonologically, Italian, but not German, has a consonantal length contrast, while German, but not Italian, has a vocalic length contrast. Analysis of responses yielded a clear asymmetry: A non-native vowel length contrast was perceived just as well as the native consonantal length contrast. A non-native consonantal length contrast, however, was perceived poorly compared to the native vocalic length contrast: Italians showed higher sensitivity for consonantal length than German learners of Italian, who in turn were better than German non-learners. Reaction time analyses indicated that, despite displaying higher accuracy, the decision was just as difficult for learners as for non-learners, suggesting different types of difficulty for listeners with and without experience with a consonantal length contrast.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.