Aims The present study was done to assess the role of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among the presenting manifestations of and fatalities from cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Methods and results We analysed altogether 351 cases of CS presenting from year 1998 through 2015 in Finland. There were 262 patients with a clinical diagnosis and treatment of CS, 27 patients with an initial lifetime diagnosis of giant cell myocarditis that was later converted to CS, and 62 cases detected at autopsy and identified by screening >820 000 death certificates from the national cause-of-death registry. The total case series comprised 253 females and 98 males aged on average 52 years at presentation. High-grade atrioventricular block was the most common first sign of CS (n = 147, 42%) followed by heart failure (n = 58, 17%), unexpected fatal (n = 38) or aborted (n = 12) SCD (14%), and sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 48, 14%). Severe coronary artery disease was found at autopsy concomitant with CS in four of the 38 cases presenting with fatal SCD. Of all deaths recorded till the end of 2015, 64% (n = 54/84) were unexpected SCDs from CS that had either been silent during life or defied all attempts at diagnosis. The Kaplan–Meier estimate (95% CI) of survival from symptom onset was 85% (80–90%) at 5 years and 76% (68–84%) at 10 years. Conclusion Together fatal and aborted SCD constitute 14% of the presenting manifestations of CS. Nearly two-thirds of all fatalities from CS are caused by undiagnosed granulomas in the heart.

Background: Symptomatic high-grade atrioventricular block (AVB) is the most common and often the only presenting manifestation (lone AVB) of cardiac sarcoidosis. Implantation of an intracardiac cardioverter defibrillator instead of a pacemaker is recommended, but the true risk of fatal arrhythmia, one incident to lone AVB in particular, remains poorly known. Methods: We used Myocardial Inflammatory Diseases in Finland Study Group Registry to analyze the presentations, left ventricular (LV) function, pacemaker therapy, and ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis. From year 1988 to 2015, altogether 325 cases of cardiac sarcoidosis were diagnosed in Finland. Of them, 143 patients (112 women, mean age 52 years) presented with Mobitz II second degree or third degree AVB in the absence of other explanatory cardiac disease. Results: Concomitant with AVB at presentation, 20 patients had either ventricular tachycardia or severe LV dysfunction with ejection fraction <35% and 29 patients had nonsevere LV dysfunction (ejection fraction, 35%–50%) while 90 patients presented with AVB alone. During a median of 2.8 years’ follow-up, 23 sudden cardiac deaths (fatal or aborted) and 19 ventricular tachycardias were recorded as arrhythmic end point events. Their composite 5-year incidence (95% confidence interval) was 56% (36%–88%) in the AVB subgroup with ventricular tachycardia or severe LV dysfunction versus 24% (12%–49%) in the subgroup with nonsevere LV dysfunction and 24% (15%–38%) with lone AVB ( P =0.019). The 5-year incidence of sudden cardiac death was 34% (16%–71%), 14% (6%–35%), and 9% (4%–22%) in the respective subgroups ( P =0.060). Conclusions: The risk of sudden cardiac death is significant in cardiac sarcoidosis presenting with high-grade AVB with or without ventricular tachycardia or LV dysfunction. The consensus recommendation to implant an intracardiac cardioverter defibrillator whenever permanent pacing is needed seems well-founded.

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) predisposes to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in CS have been issued by the Heart Rhythm Society in 2014 and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society consortium in 2017. How well they discriminate high from low risk remains unknown. Methods: We analyzed the data of 398 patients with CS detected in Finland from 1988 through 2017. All had clinical cardiac manifestations. Histological diagnosis was myocardial in 193 patients (definite CS) and extracardiac in 205 (probable CS). Patients with and without Class I or IIa ICD indications at presentation were identified, and subsequent occurrences of SCD (fatal or aborted) and sustained ventricular tachycardia were recorded, as were ICD indications emerging first on follow-up. Results: Over a median of 4.8 years, 41 patients (10.3%) had fatal (n=8) or aborted (n=33) SCD, and 98 (24.6%) experienced SCD or sustained ventricular tachycardia as the first event. By the Heart Rhythm Society guideline, Class I or IIa ICD indications were present in 339 patients (85%) and absent in 59 (15%), of whom 264 (78%) and 30 (51%), respectively, received an ICD. Cumulative 5-year incidence of SCD was 10.7% (95% CI, 7.4%–15.4%) in patients with ICD indications versus 4.8% (95% CI, 1.2%–19.1%) in those without (χ 2 =1.834, P =0.176). The corresponding rates of SCD were 13.8% (95% CI, 9.1%–21.0%) versus 6.3% (95% CI, 0.7%–54.0%; χ 2 =0.814, P =0.367) in definite CS and 7.6% (95% CI, 3.8%–15.1%) versus 3.3% (95% CI, 0.5%–22.9%; χ 2 =0.680, P =0.410) in probable CS. In multivariable regression analysis, SCD was predicted by definite histological diagnosis ( P =0.033) but not by Class I or IIa ICD indications ( P =0.210). In patients without ICD indications at presentation, 5-year incidence of SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and emerging Class I or IIa indications was 53% (95% CI, 40%–71%). By the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guideline, all patients with complete data (n=245) had Class I or IIa indications for ICD implantation. Conclusions: Current ICD guidelines fail to distinguish a truly low-risk group of patients with clinically manifest CS, the 5-year risk of SCD approaching 5% despite absent ICD indications. Further research is needed on prognostic factors, including the role of diagnostic histology. Meanwhile, all patients with CS presenting with clinical cardiac manifestations should be considered for an ICD implantation.

Aims Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and giant cell myocarditis (GCM) are inflammatory cardiomyopathies sharing histopathological and clinical features. Their differentiation is difficult and susceptible of confusion and apparent mistakes. The possibility that they represent different phenotypes of a single disease has been debated. Methods and resultsWe made a retrospective audit of 73 cases of GCM diagnosed in Finland since the late 1980s. All available histological material was reanalyzed as were other examinations pertinent to the distinction between GCM and CS. Finding granulomas in or outside the heart was considered diagnostic of CS and exclusive of GCM. Altogether 45 of the 73 cases of GCM (62%) were reclassified as CS. In all except one case, this was based on finding sarcoid granulomas that either had been originally missed (n = 29) or misinterpreted (n = 11) or were found in additional posttransplant myocardial specimens (n = 3) or samples of extracardiac tissue (n = 1) accrued over the disease course. Supporting the reclassification, patients relocated to the CS group had less heart failure at presentation (prevalence 20% vs. 46%, P = 0.017) and better 1 year transplant-free survival (82% vs. 45%, P = 0.011) than patients considered to represent true GCM. Conclusions Recognizing granulomas in or outside the heart remains a challenge for the pathologist. Given that CS and GCM are considered distinct diseases and granulomas exclusive of GCM, many cases of GCM, if thoroughly scrutinized, may need reclassification as CS. However, whether CS and GCM are truly different entities or parts of a one-disease continuum has not yet been conclusively settled.