Liquid paraffin-water emulsions were prepared by homogenizing oil phases containing sorbitan oleate (Span 80) and aqueous phases containing layered double hydroxide (LDH) particles or Laponite particles. While water-in-oil (w/o) emulsions are obtained by combining LDH with Span 80, the emulsions stabilized by Laponite-Span 80 are always o/w types regardless of the Span 80 concentration. Laser-induced fluorescent confocal micrographs indicate that particles are absorbed on the emulsion surfaces, suggesting all the emulsions are stabilized by the particles. The difference of the particle-stabilized emulsion type may be explained by comparing particle contact angles and the oil-water interfacial tensions, indicating that more Span 80 molecules are adsorbed on the LDH particles than on Laponite. Apparently, the LDH particles are rendered more hydrophobic by Span 80, resulting in the formation of w/o emulsions. The long-term stability of the emulsions was also compared. Emulsions stabilized by Span 80 alone completely separate into two bulk phases of oil and water after 3 months. However, emulsion stability is greatly enhanced with the addition of LDH or Laponite particles. This synergism was accounted for by an increase of the dilational viscoelasticity modulus of the oil-water interface after particles were added to the aqueous phase. This increase indicates that the gel-like particle layer stays at the oil-water interface and resists emulsion coalescence. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images display the presence of a firm layer surrounding the emulsion droplets and a three-dimensional particle network which extends into the bulk phase aiding emulsion stability.
Executive SummaryTerminal boxes usually serve a single building zone, controlling the air-flow rate to the zone and reheating the air when it is too cool. Each terminal box has a minimum air-flow rate that ensures the ventilation requirements of the occupants of the zone served are met. This minimum air-flow rate is maintained at a constant value based on the design occupancy of the zone, which often corresponds to the maximum occupancy, because measurements of actual occupancy are not currently used to adjust the flow rate. Therefore, the minimum flow rate must meet the ventilation needs of the fully occupied zone. The total flow rate may be higher than the minimum to provide adequate cooling or heating, but the minimum for ventilation should always be met.In practice, control system integrators and installers often set the cooling minimum air-flow rate for ventilation to between 30% and 50% of the maximum air-flow rate of the terminal box. Building occupancy, however, varies dynamically. Conference rooms, cafeterias, auditoriums, and other assembly spaces are often unoccupied for significant periods of time. Office occupancy varies during the course of a work day, from day to day, and over the longer term because of attendance of meetings elsewhere, business travel, changing room functions, and variations in staffing. The resulting overventilation, during times when the space has less than maximum occupancy or is unoccupied, wastes significant fan energy and causes discomfort for occupants in some spaces (e.g., conference rooms) from overcooling or overheating, especially in interior zones that do not have reheat in the terminal boxes.Common occupancy sensors, which measure whether occupants are present or not, are commonly used for lighting control in conference rooms and other spaces with variable occupancy. They could be used to enable a terminal box to be switched to an occupied standby mode in which the air-flow rate is set to zero when no occupants are in the zone the box serves. If advanced occupancy sensors, which count the actual number of occupants in a room, were used to control terminal boxes, the minimum air-flow rate set point for the terminal box could be reset dynamically based on the actual occupancy sensed. This study evaluates the savings potential from use of occupancy-based control (OBC) of terminal boxes for large office buildings with variable-air-volume (VAV) heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems using both common occupancy sensors and advanced occupancy sensors.Large office buildings were selected for this study because they represent the subsector of commercial buildings with the greatest use of VAV HVAC systems in the U.S. They contribute 4.4 billion ft 2 of floor space and represent 6.1% of the total commercial floor space.Energy savings are determined from estimates of annual energy consumption obtained from simulations of representative large office buildings with and without OBC of terminal boxes and lighting for all 15 U.S. climate zones. The building without ...
Today, many large commercial buildings use sophisticated building automation systems (BASs) to manage a wide range of building equipment. While the capabilities of BASs have increased over time, many buildings still do not fully use the BAS's capabilities and the BASs are not properly commissioned, operated or maintained, which leads to inefficient operation, increased energy use, and reduced lifetimes of the equipment. This report investigates the energy savings potential of several common heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) system re-tuning measures on a typical large office building prototype model, using the Department of Energy's building energy modeling software, EnergyPlus. The baseline prototype model uses roughly as much energy as an average large office building in the existing building stock, but does not utilize any re-tuning measures. Individual re-tuning measures simulated against this baseline include automatic schedule adjustments, damper minimum flow adjustments, thermostat adjustments, as well as dynamic resets (set points that change continuously with building and/or outdoor conditions) to static pressure, supply air temperature, condenser water temperature, chilled and hot water temperature, and chilled and hot water differential pressure set points. Six combinations of these individual measures have been formulated -each designed to conform to limitations to implementation of certain individual measures that might exist in typical buildings. All of these measures and combinations were simulated in 16 cities representative of specific U.S. climate zones.The modeling results suggest that the most effective energy savings measures are those that affect the demand-side of the building (air-systems and schedules). Many of the demand-side individual measures were capable of reducing annual HVAC system energy consumption by over 20% in most cities that were modeled. Supply-side measures (chiller, cooling tower and pump measures) affecting HVAC plant conditions were only modestly successful (less than 5% annual HVAC energy savings for most cities for all measures). Combining many of the re-tuning measures revealed deep savings potential. Some of the more aggressive combinations revealed between 35% and 75% reductions in annual HVAC energy consumption, depending on climate and building vintage.iv Executive SummaryToday, many large (>100,000 sf) commercial buildings use sophisticated building automation systems (BASs) to manage a wide range of building equipment. While the capabilities of BASs have increased over time, many buildings still do not fully use the BAS's capabilities and are not properly commissioned, operated or maintained, which leads to inefficient operation, increased energy use, and reduced lifetimes of the equipment.Periodic re-tuning of building controls and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems helps to reduce inefficient and faulty operations and improve building efficiency. Re-tuning is a systematic, semi-automated process of detecting, dia...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.