Background This prospective multicenter study funded by the DEGUM assesses the diagnostic accuracy of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients. Methods Patients at high risk for HCC with a histologically proven focal liver lesion on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively in a multicenter approach. Clinical and imaging data were entered via online entry forms. The diagnostic accuracies for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC were compared for the conventional interpretation of standardized CEUS at the time of the examination (= CEUS on-site) and the two CEUS algorithms ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) and CEUS LI-RADS (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System). Results 321 patients were recruited in 43 centers; 299 (93.1 %) had liver cirrhosis. The diagnosis according to histology was HCC in 256 cases, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in 23 cases. In the subgroup of cirrhotic patients (n = 299), the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC was achieved with the CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (94.2 %) and CEUS on-site (90.9 %). The lowest sensitivity was reached with the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (64 %; p < 0.001). However, the specificity of CEUS LI-RADS (78.9 %) was superior to that of ESCULAP (50.9 %) and CEUS on-site (64.9 %; p < 0.001). At the same time, the negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS LI-RADS was significantly inferior to that of ESCULAP (34.1 % vs. 67.4 %; p < 0.001) and CEUS on-site (62.7 %; p < 0.001). The positive predictive values of all modalities were high (around 90 %), with the best results seen for CEUS LI-RADS and CEUS on-site. Conclusion This is the first multicenter, prospective comparison of standardized CEUS and the recently developed CEUS-based algorithms in histologically proven liver lesions in cirrhotic patients. Our results reaffirm the excellent diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients. However, on-site diagnosis by an experienced examiner achieves an almost equal diagnostic accuracy compared to CEUS-based diagnostic algorithms.

BackgroundThe mortality due to hemorrhage of esophageal varices (EV) is still high. The predominant cause for EV is liver cirrhosis, which has a high prevalence in Western Europe. Therefore, non-invasive screening markers for the presence of EV are of interest. Here, we aim to investigate whether non-inflammatory gall bladder wall thickening (GBWT) may serve as predictor for the presence of EV in comparison and combination with other non-invasive clinical and laboratory parameters.MethodsOne hundred ninety four patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Abdominal ultrasound, upper endoscopy and blood tests were evaluated. GBWT, spleen size and the presence of ascites were evaluated by ultrasound. Platelet count and Child-Pugh-score were also recorded. The study population was categorized in two groups: 122 patients without esophageal varices (non EV) compared to 72 patients with EV were analyzed by uni-and multivariate analysis.ResultsIn the EV group 46% showed a non-inflammatory GBWT of ≥4 mm, compared to 12% in the non-EV group (p < 0.01). GBWT was significantly higher in EV patients compared to the non-EV group (mean: 4.4 mm vs. 2.8 mm, p < 0.0001), and multivariate analysis confirmed GBWT as independent predictor for EV (p < 0.04). The platelets/GBWT ratio (cut-off > 46.2) had a sensitivity and specificity of 78 and 86%, PPV 76% and NPV of 87%, and ROC analysis calculated the AUC of 0.864 (CI 0.809–0.919).ConclusionsGBWT occurs significantly more often in patients with EV. However, because of the low sensitivity, combination with other non-invasive parameters such as platelet count is recommended.

Background/Aims The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of B-Mode ultrasound and Hepatorenal Index (HRI) by high-end devices for the detection and classification of hepatic steatosis in patients with various causes of chronic liver disease (CLD). Methods We retrospectively enrolled patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy and baseline ultrasound between March 2016 and May 2019. Sonographic graduation of steatosis (0˚-III) using B-Mode criteria and HRI were correlated with the histological graduation (S0 (<5% fat), S1 (�5-33%), S2 (>33-66%) and S3 (>66%). Interobserver agreement was calculated. Results 157 patients were evaluated. B-Mode ultrasound had a sensitivity of 75.6% and a specificity of 76.0% to differentiate between steatosis and no steatosis (AUROC 0.758). Using B-Mode criteria for advanced steatosis (�II˚), specificity for presence of histological steatosis was �98.7%. For detection of advanced steatosis (�S2), sensitivity of B-mode criteria was 90.9%. In a subgroup of patients with advanced liver fibrosis, sensitivity of B-mode criteria was 95.0% for detection of advanced steatosis (S�2). A HRI cutoff value of 1.46 differentiates between patients with steatosis and patients without steatosis with a sensitivity of 42.7% and a specificity of 90.7% (AUROC 0.680). Interobserver agreement of both B-Mode and HRI was good to excellent. Conclusion B-Mode ultrasound using high-end devices is an excellent method to detect advanced steatosis in patients with various CLD. For diagnosis of mild steatosis, modern ultrasound

Background and study aims Recently, a new external additional working channel (AWC) was introduced by which conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be improved to a technique termed “EMR+”. We first evaluated this novel technique in comparison to classical EMR in flat lesions. Methods The trial was prospectively conducted in an ex vivo animal model with porcine stomachs placed into the EASIE-R simulator. Prior to intervention, standardized lesions were set by coagulation dots, measuring 1, 2, 3 or 4 cm. Results Overall, 152 procedures were performed. EMR and EMR+ were both very reliable in 1-cm lesions, each showing en bloc resection rates of 100 %. EMR+ en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in 2-cm lesions (95.44 % vs. 54.55 %, P = 0.02), in 3-cm lesions (86.36 % vs. 18.18 %, P < 0.01) and also in 4-cm lesions (60.00 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.01). Perforations occurred only in EMR+ procedures in 4-cm lesions (3 of 20; 15 %). Conclusions With its grasp-and-snare technique, EMR+ facilitates en bloc resection of larger lesions compared to conventional EMR. In lesions 2 cm and larger, EMR+ has demonstrated advantages, especially concerning en bloc resection rate. At 3 cm, EMR+ reaches its best discriminatory power whereas EMR+ has inherent limits at 4 cm and in lesions of that size, other techniques such as ESD or surgery should be considered.

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are characterized by overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines. We determined the association of serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, soluble-IL-2-receptor (sIL-2R) and CRP as well as of faecal calprotectin (FC) values with disease activity in CD and UC patients. This prospective study included 145 CD and 84 UC patients. Serum proinflammatory biomarkers and FC levels were measured and demographic, clinical and endoscopic characteristics were collected. Uni-and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. Serum IL-6 and CRP levels as well as FC values of CD patients were associated with clinical and endoscopic remission. In multivariate analysis serum IL-6 levels remained significantly associated with clinical and endoscopic remission. FC levels were also associated with endoscopic remission in CD patients. CD patients under the threshold levels of 8.5 pg/mL and 5.5 pg/mL for serum IL-6 were in 70% and 66% in clinical and endoscopic remission, respectively. Serum sIL-2R, CRP levels and FC values of UC patients were associated in univariate analysis with clinical and endoscopic remission. In multivariate analysis CRP and FC values were associated with clinical remission and serum sIL-2R as well as FC levels with endoscopic remission. UC patients under the threshold levels of 759 IU/mL and 646 IU/mL for serum sIL-2R were in 76% and 76% in clinical and endoscopic remission, respectively. Beside CRP and FC, serum IL-6 levels in CD patients and sIL-2R levels in UC patients can be a further useful non-invasive biomarker to identify the disease activity status.