RationaleThe use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in severe hypoxaemic respiratory failure from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been described, but reported utilisation and outcomes are variable, and detailed information on patient characteristics is lacking. We aim to report clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients requiring VV-ECMO, admitted over 2 months to a high-volume UK centre.MethodsPatient information, including baseline characteristics and clinical parameters, was collected retrospectively from electronic health records for COVID-19 VV-ECMO admissions between 3rd March and 2nd May 2020. Clinical management is described. Data are reported for survivors and non-survivors.ResultsWe describe 43 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who received VV-ECMO. Median age was 46 years [IQR 35.5–52.5], 76.7% were male. Median time from symptom onset to VV-ECMO was 14 days [IQR 11–17.5]. All patients underwent computed tomography imaging, finding extensive pulmonary consolidation in 95.3%, and pulmonary embolus in 27.9%. 79.1% received immunomodulation with methylprednisolone for persistent maladaptive hyperinflammatory state. Vasopressors were used in 86%, and 44.2% received renal replacement therapy. Median duration on VV-ECMO was 13 days [IQR 8–20]. Fourteen patients died (32.6%) and 29 survived (67.4%) to hospital discharge. Non-survivors had significantly higher d-dimer (38.2 versus 9.5 mg·L−1, Fibrinogen Equivalent Units; p=0.035) and creatinine (169 versus 73 umol·L−1; p=0.022) at commencement of ECMO.ConclusionsOur data supports the use of VV-ECMO in selected COVID-19 patients. The cohort was characterised by high degree of alveolar consolidation, systemic inflammation, and intravascular thrombosis.
In this retrospective observational cohort study, we aimed to describe the rate of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit change, the associated risk factors and its relationship with patient characteristics and outcome in patients receiving venovenous (VV) ECMO at our center between January 2015 and November 2017. Twenty-seven percent of the patients receiving VV ECMO (n = 224) had at least one circuit change, which was associated with lower ICU survival (68% vs 82% p=0.032) and longer ICU stay (30 vs. 17 days p < 0.001). Circuit duration was similar when stratified by gender, clinical severity, or prior circuit change. Hematological abnormalities and increased transmembrane lung pressure (TMLP) were the most frequent indication for circuit change. The change in transmembrane lung resistance (Δ TMLR) gave better prediction of circuit change than TMLP, TMLR, or ΔTMLP. Low postoxygenator PO 2 was indicated as a reason for one-third of the circuit changes. However, the ECMO oxygen transfer was significantly higher in cases of circuit change with documented "low postoxygenator PO 2 " than those without (244 ± 62 vs. 200 ± 57 ml/min; p = 0.009). The results suggest that circuit change in VV ECMO is associated with worse outcomes, that the Δ TMLR is a better predictor of circuit change than TMLP, and that the postoxygenator PO 2 is an unreliable proxy for the oxygenator function. ASAIO
A broncho-cutaneous fistula (BCF) is a communicating tract between the bronchus and the cutaneous surface of the thoracic wall and can be the primary presenting sign of several disease processes. It has been associated with positive pressure ventilation (PPV), post pneumonectomy, thoracostomy tubes, perforating chest trauma, neoplasia and chronic empyema. We report a case of a 45-year-old immunocompetent man presenting with severe hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to a BCF as a result of tuberculosis (TB)-related empyema necessitans. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) was employed during spontaneous breathing to mitigate the risks of PPV, to facilitate diagnostics and enable targeted treatment. Awake VV ECMO is an effective supportive therapy for complex, destructive lung pathologies with a known reversible aetiology in which PPV would be potentially detrimental.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.