Omadacycline is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline antibiotic with microbiological activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes and atypical bacteria that is being developed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The bioavailability of a phase 3 tablet formulation relative to that obtained via intravenous (i.v.) administration (and of other oral formulations relative to that of the phase 3 tablet) was investigated in an open-label, randomized, four-period, crossover study with healthy subjects age 18 to 50 years. Subjects received omadacycline at 100 mg i.v., 300 mg orally as two different tablet formulations with different dissolution profiles, and 300 mg as an oral solution. Plasma omadacycline concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Twenty of 24 subjects completed all treatment periods. The two tablet formulations produced equivalent total exposures. The phase 3 tablet produced an exposure equivalent to that of the 100-mg i.v. dose, with a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence intervals [CI]) for area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity [AUC∞]) of 1.00 (0.93, 1.07). The absolute bioavailability of the tablets was approximately 34.5%. Intersubject variability was consistent among the oral formulations (∼20 to 25%). Single oral and i.v. doses of omadacycline were well tolerated; three subjects experienced mild adverse events (dizziness, nausea, and vomiting) that resolved without intervention. A 300-mg dose of the tablet formulation of omadacycline intended for use in phase 3 studies produced a total exposure equivalent to that of a 100-mg i.v. dose.
Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is indicated for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Absorption of sacubitril/valsartan and conversion of sacubitril (prodrug) to sacubitrilat (neprilysin inhibitor) was rapid with maximum plasma concentrations of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) reaching within 0.5, 1.5-2.0, and 2.0-3.0 h, respectively. With a two-fold increase in dose, an increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was proportional for sacubitril, ~1.9-fold for sacubitrilat, and ~1.7-fold for valsartan in healthy subjects. Following multiple twice-daily administration, steady-state maximum plasma concentration was reached within 3 days, showing no accumulation for sacubitril and valsartan, while ~1.6-fold accumulation for sacubitrilat. Sacubitril is eliminated predominantly as sacubitrilat through the kidney; valsartan is eliminated mainly by biliary route. Drug-drug interactions of sacubitril/valsartan were evaluated with medications commonly used in patients with heart failure including furosemide, warfarin, digoxin, carvedilol, levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combination, amlodipine, omeprazole, hydrochlorothiazide, intravenous nitrates, metformin, statins, and sildenafil. Co-administration with sacubitril/valsartan increased the maximum plasma concentration (~2.0-fold) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (1.3-fold) of atorvastatin; however, it did not affect the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. Age, sex, or ethnicity did not affect the pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan. In patients with heart failure vs. healthy subjects, area under the plasma concentration-time curves of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan were higher by approximately 1.6-, 2.1-, and 2.3-fold, respectively. Renal impairment had no significant impact on sacubitril and valsartan area under the plasma concentration-time curves, while the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of sacubitrilat correlated with degree of renal function (1.3-, 2.3-, 2.9-, and 3.3-fold with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease, respectively). Moderate hepatic impairment increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves of valsartan and sacubitrilat ~2.1-fold.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of regional intravenous (i.v.) injection of ceftiofur in delivery of this drug to joint fluid and plasma in a limb distal to a tourniquet in five, healthy, adult, mixed breed beef cattle. A tourniquet was positioned in the mid-metacarpal region, and 500 mg of ceftiofur was administered through a catheter in the dorsal common digital vein (DCDV). Plasma samples were collected from the catheter at 15, 30 and 45 min postinjection, and from the abaxial proper palmar vein (APPV) at 15 min postinjection. Synovial fluid was collected from the metacarpal phalangeal joint at 45 min postinjection. Ceftiofur concentrations were estimated in plasma and synovial fluid using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and a microbiological assay utilizing Pasteurella haemolytica as the test organism. Both assays indicated highest plasma concentrations of ceftiofur at 15 min, with the concentrations declining with time. Concentrations of ceftiofur in plasma obtained from the DCDV were not significantly different from APPV levels, indicating rapid distribution of ceftiofur within the limb. Microbiological assay always demonstrated higher concentrations of ceftiofur compared with HPLC assay, because the former probably also detected the active metabolites of ceftiofur as well as the parent compound. At 45 min, ceftiofur concentrations determined by HPLC were 251+/-97 and 15+/-5 microg/mL in plasma and synovial fluid, respectively. Regional intravenous injection appears to be a feasible technique to produce rapid distribution of ceftiofur within the limb well above therapeutic concentrations.
Context Glucocorticoids (GC) prescribed for chronic pediatric illnesses are associated with osteoporotic fractures. Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (ZA) compared with placebo to treat pediatric GC-induced osteoporosis (GIO). Patients, Design and Setting Children 5-17 years of age with GIO were enrolled in this multi-national randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (ClinicaTrials.gov NCT 00799266). Interventions and Main Outcome Measures Eligible children were randomized 1:1 to six monthly IV ZA 0.05 mg/kg or IV placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density Z-score (LSBMDZ) from baseline to month 12. Incident fractures and safety were assessed. Results Thirty-four children were enrolled (mean age 12.6 ± 3.4 years [18 on ZA, 16 on placebo]), all with low-trauma vertebral fractures. LSBMDZ increased from −2.13 ± 0.79 to −1.49 ± 1.05 on ZA, compared with −2.38 ± 0.90 to −2.27 ± 1.03 on placebo (least squares means difference 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.02, 0.81; p=0.04]); when corrected for height Z-score, the least squares means difference in LBMDZ was 0.75 [0.27, 1.22; p=0.004]. Two children on placebo had new low-trauma VF versus none on ZA. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 15/18 children (83%) on ZA, and in 12/16 (75%) on placebo, most frequently within 10 days after the first infusion. There were no deaths, nor treatment discontinuations due to treatment-emergent AEs. Conclusions LSBMDZ increased significantly on ZA compared with placebo over one year in children with GIO. Most AEs occurred after the first infusion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.