Remnant ablation can be achieved by either administering an empiric fixed dose or using dosimetry-guided techniques. Because of the technical and logistic difficulties, most centers have adapted the fixed-dose or standard-dose technique for remnant ablation using (131)I. In the late 1970s, low-dose (131)I remnant ablation was introduced, and subsequently many centers confirmed the effectiveness of such therapy. However, the optimal dose (administered activity) of (131)I for remnant ablation is not yet settled. In a randomized clinical trial to find out the smallest possible effective dose for remnant ablation in cases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, between July 1995 and January 2002, 565 patients were randomized into eight groups according to (131)I administered activity, starting at 15 mCi and increasing activity in increments of 5 mCi until 50 mCi. In the postrandomization phase, 56 patients were excluded from the study for various reasons, and final analysis was done with 509 patients. The mean age of the patients was 37.5 +/- 12.7 yr with a female to male ratio of 2.6. The surgical procedure was total/near-total thyroidectomy in 72% and subtotal or hemithyroidectomy in the rest. Histology was papillary thyroid carcinoma in 80.6% of patients and follicular thyroid carcinoma in the rest. With one dose of (131)I, remnant ablation was achieved in 59.6, 63.6, 81.4, 83.6, 79.4, 78.3, 84.4, and 81.8% of patients in the 15- to 50-mCi groups, respectively (overall ablation rate, 77.6%). The successful ablation rate was statistically different in patients receiving less than 25 mCi of (131)I compared with those receiving at least 25 mCi [63 of 102 (61.8%) vs. 332 of 407 (81.6%); P = 0.006]. However, there was no significant intergroup difference in outcome among patients receiving 25-50 mCi of (131)I. Patients with small tumor size (=5 cm), adequate surgery (total/near-total thyroidectomy), and radioiodine neck uptake of less than or equal to 10% had odds ratios of 2.4 [confidence interval (CI), 1.3-3.98], 2.6 (CI, 1.6-4.2), and 2.2 (CI, 1.4-3.5), respectively, for successful remnant ablation. Patients receiving at least 25 mCi of (131)I had a three times better chance of getting remnant ablation than patients receiving lesser activity of (131)I. Any activity of (131)I between 25 and 50 mCi appears to be adequate for remnant ablation.
Increasing the empirical 131 I initial dose to more than 50 mCi results in plateauing of the dose-response curve and thus, conventional high dose remnant ablation needs critical evaluation. Based on dosimetry results, one should aim to deliver about 30,000 cGy to the thyroid remnant, as higher doses do not appear to yield a higher ablation rate.
TART appears to be a safe, effective, and promising therapeutic option in patients with inoperable HCC.
The thermoluminescence dosemeter (TLD) was used for measuring radiation dose to family members of thyrotoxicosis and thyroid cancer patients treated with (131)I using CaSO(4):Dy discs. There were 45 family members of thyrotoxicosis patients, who were divided into two groups with 22 in the first and 23 in the second group. Radiation safety instructions were the same for both the groups except in the second group where the patients were advised to use a separate bed at home for the first 3 d of dose administration. An activity ranging from 185 to 500 MBq was administered to these patients. The whole-body dose to family members ranged from 0.4 to 2.4 mSv (mean 1.1 mSv) in the first group and 0-1.9 mSv (mean 0.6 mSv) in the second group. A total of 297 family members of thyroid cancer patients were studied for whole-body dose estimation. An activity ranging from 0.925 to 7.4 GBq was administered to the thyroid cancer patients. The family members were divided into three groups depending upon the mode of transport and facilities available at home to avoid close proximity with the patient. Group A with 25 family members received a dose ranging from 0 to 0.9 mSv (mean 0.4 mSv), group B with 96 family members received a dose ranging from 0 to 8.5 mSv (mean 0.8 mSv) and group C with 176 family members received a dose ranging from 0 to 5.0 mSv (mean 0.8 mSv). The thyroid monitoring was also done in 103 family members who attended the patients in isolation wards for >2 d. Thyroid dose in them ranged from 0 to 2.5 mGy (mean 0.1 mGy).
scintigraphic method for the estimation of the thyroid mass in patients with Graves' disease is described. The method was first standardized using thyroid phantoms with eight different volumes ranging from 5 to 110 cm(3). The planar and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images of each phantom were acquired with four different activities [3.7 MBq (100 microCi), 11.1 MBq (300 microCi), 22.2 MBq (600 microCi) and 37 MBq (1.0 mCi) of 99mTc-pertechnetate] with a 20% window symmetrically placed over the photopeak of 99mTc. The thyroid lobes were enclosed with the help of regions of interest (ROI) tools and a threshold was selected to identify the thyroid boundaries. The same threshold was used in all slices of an image. In the phantom study, a 20% threshold for planar images and a 30% threshold for SPECT were found to be optimum for measuring the thyroid volume. The volume from planar images was calculated by the formula described by Allen and Goodwin (The scintillation counter as an instrument for in-vivo determination of thyroid weight. Radiology 1952; 58: 68-79), whereas, in SPECT images, the sum of the slice areas was multiplied by the slice thickness. The estimated volume of each phantom was compared and correlated with its actual volume. After standardization of the technique with phantom studies, planar scintigraphy (with 20% threshold) in 51 patients and SPECT (with 30% and 35% threshold) in 40 patients with Graves' disease were performed to estimate the thyroid size. The thyroid size was also estimated by ultrasonography, which showed good agreement with the scintigraphic method, particularly with SPECT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.