Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of coronary artery calcification (CAC) on hemodialysis (HD) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We enrolled 211 HD patients who underwent PCI (men: n = 155, age: 71 ± 1 0 years). Severe CAC was defined as calcification with an arc of 360° on intravascular ultrasound. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictors of severe CAC. The impact of severe CAC on target lesion revascularization (TLR) was evaluated. Patients with severe CAC (46%) had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (79 vs 59%, P = .003) and longer HD duration (7.7 vs 3.4 years, P < .001) than those with non-severe CAC. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that DM, HD duration, and angiographic calcification were significant predictors for severe CAC (odds ratio 4.42, 1.13, and 6.62; P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). After the median follow-up period of 580 days (interquartile range, 302–730 days), Kaplan–Meier curve analysis revealed that severe CAC was associated with an increased risk for TLR (χ2 12.7; P = .002). In HD patients with CAD after PCI, DM and HD duration were significant predictors for severe CAC. Furthermore, severe CAC was associated with an increased risk for TLR.
Introduction: Several factors related to lesion characteristics and endovascular therapy (EVT) procedures have been reported to affect primary patency after EVT. However, it is unknown why these factors were associated with primary patency. We hypothesized patency failure was related to poor blood flow in affected arteries. Methods: This retrospective study included 131 consecutive patients who had received EVT with bare metal stents for peripheral artery disease caused by femoropopliteal artery lesions. Based on the tertile post-EVT flow velocity of the superficial femoral artery (SFA), patients were divided into high ( n = 43), middle ( n = 44), and low ( n = 44) flow velocity groups. Flow velocity was measured using the frame count method. We measured incidence of major adverse limb events (MALE), composed of target lesion revascularization (TLR), non-TLR, and major amputation. Results: At a median follow-up period of 22.7 months, MALE had occurred in 7 (16.3%), 10 (22.7%), and 29 (65.9%) of patients from the high, middle, and low SFA flow velocity groups, respectively ( p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed incidence of MALE was significantly higher in the patients of low SFA flow velocity (log-rank test χ2 = 38.8, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis found low SFA flow velocity to be an independent predictor for MALE (hazard ratio: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.27 to 8.60; p < 0.001) as was ankle–brachial index. Conclusion: Post-EVT SFA flow velocity for femoropopliteal artery lesions treated with bare metal stents is an independent predictor of limb patency. The frame count method for assessing arterial flow velocity is convenient and has potential for wide applications in EVT.
duct is made of two like chamber systems joined together by wall hollows. The chambers are furthermore interconnected through holes leading from the outlet side of the main control valve. The exhaust noise of the airpowered tool is limited by interacting turbulent air streams rather than by porous acoustical absorbing materials, and so remains relatively insensitive to clogging by dirt or ice and the possibly resulting explosive fracture, a consequence of a large fraction of the operating pressure acting upon the muffler casing.•CHA one-to-one ratio providing for driving one set of rollers from the other set, with an adjustable distance between sets of rollers. Because of the generally lower ratio of surface speed between feed and draw rollers, the bursting function should be quieter. The driving mechanism is simpler and more positive in adjustment than previous designs.--CHA
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.