Background Previous blinded trials of household water treatment interventions in low-income settings have failed to detect a reduction in child diarrhoea. Technological advances have enabled the development of automated in-line chlorine dosers that can disinfect drinking water without electricity, while also allowing users to continue their typical water collection practices. We aimed to evaluate the effect of installing novel passive chlorination devices at shared water points on child diarrhoea prevalence in low-income, densely populated communities in urban Bangladesh. Methods In this double-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial, 100 shared water points (clusters) in two low-income urban communities in Bangladesh were randomly assigned (1:1) to have their drinking water automatically chlorinated at the point of collection by a solid tablet chlorine doser (intervention group) or to be treated by a visually identical doser that supplied vitamin C (active control group). The trial followed an open cohort design; all children younger than 5 years residing in households accessing enrolled water points were measured every 2-3 months during a 14-month follow-up period (children could migrate into or out of the cluster). The primary outcome was caregiverreported child diarrhoea (≥3 loose or watery stools in a 24-h period [WHO criteria]) with a 1-week recall, including all available childhood observations in the analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02606981, and is completed.

Infections with enteric pathogens impose a heavy disease burden, especially among young children in low-income countries. Recent findings from randomized controlled trials of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have raised questions about current methods for assessing environmental exposure to enteric pathogens. Approaches for estimating sources and doses of exposure suffer from a number of shortcomings, including reliance on imperfect indicators of fecal contamination instead of actual pathogens and estimating exposure indirectly from imprecise measurements of pathogens in the environment and human interaction therewith. These shortcomings limit the potential for effective surveillance of exposures, identification of important sources and modes of transmission, and evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions. In this review, we summarize current and emerging approaches used to characterize enteric pathogen hazards in different environmental media as well as human interaction with those media (external measures of exposure), and review methods that measure human infection with enteric pathogens as a proxy for past exposure (internal measures of exposure). We draw from lessons learned in other areas of environmental health to highlight how external and internal measures of exposure can be used to more comprehensively assess exposure. We conclude by recommending strategies for advancing enteric pathogen exposure assessments.

No abstract

Summary Background Exposure to faecal contamination is believed to be associated with child diarrhoea and possibly stunting; however, few studies have explicitly measured the association between faecal contamination and health. We aimed to assess individual participant data (IPD) across multiple trials and observational studies to quantify the relationship for common faecal–oral transmission pathways. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of IPD from studies identified in an electronic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase on May 21, 2018. The search was done in English, but full texts published in French, Portuguese, and Spanish were also reviewed. Eligible studies quantified (1) household-level faecal indicator bacteria concentrations along common faecal-oral transmission pathways of drinking water, soil, or food, on children's hands or fomites, or fly densities in food preparation areas; and (2) individual-level diarrhoea or linear growth measures for children younger than 5 years in low-income and middle-income countries. For the diarrhoea analysis, all definitions of diarrhoea were eligible but studies were excluded if they used a recall period longer than 7 days. For the linear growth analysis (using height-for-age Z scores [HAZ]), cross-sectional studies were excluded, because of the absence of longitudinal environmental contamination data measured before the growth outcomes. We used multilevel generalised mixed-effects models to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for diarrhoea and the difference in HAZ scores for individual studies associated with a 1-log 10 higher measure of faecal contamination. Estimates from each study were combined under a random-effects meta-analysis framework. The study protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018102114). Findings From 72 eligible studies, we included IPD for 20 studies in the meta-analyses, totalling 54 225 diarrhoea or linear growth observations matched to faecal indicator bacteria concentrations in drinking water, and a further 35 010 observations with faecal contamination data for the other transmission pathways. Child diarrhoea was associated with 1-log 10 higher faecal indicator bacteria concentrations in drinking water (OR 1·09, 95% CI 1·04 to 1·13; p=0·0002, I 2 =34%, 95% CI 0 to 62) and on children's hands (1·11, 1·02 to 1·22; p=0·021, I 2 =0%, 0 to 71). Lower HAZ scores were associated with 1-log 10 higher median faecal indicator bacteria concentrations in drinking water (HAZ −0·04, 95% CI −0·06 to −0·01; p=0·0054; I 2 =19%, 95% CI 0 to 63) and on fomites (–0·06, −0·12 to 0·00; p=0·044, I 2 =57%, 0 to 90). Interpretation Although summary measures from individual studies ofte...