This study was undertaken to identify premotor neurons in the pontomedullary reticular formation serving as relay neurons between the sensory trigeminal complex and the motor nuclei of the VIIth and XIIth nerves. Trigeminoreticular projections were first investigated after injections of anterogradely transported tracers (biotinylated dextran amine, biocytin) into single subdivisions of the sensory trigeminal complex. The results show that the trigeminoreticular projections were abundant from the pars interpolaris (5i) and caudalis (5c) and moderate from pars oralis (5o) of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Injections into the 5i and 5c produce dense anterograde labeling (1) in the dorsal medullary reticular field; (2) in the parvocellular reticular field, medially adjacent to the 5i; and (3) more rostral in the region dorsal and lateral to the superior olivary nucleus. Some labeled terminals were also found in the intermediate reticular field, whereas only light anterograde labeling was observed in the gigantocellular and oral pontine reticular formation. The 5o sends fibers and terminals throughout the whole reticular formation, with no clear preferential projections within a particular field. Only light projections originated from the principal nucleus (5P). In a second series of experiments, we examined whether premotor neurons in the reticular formation are afferented by trigeminal fibers. Double labeling was performed by injection of an anterograde tracer in the 5i and 5c and retrograde tracer (gold-horseradish peroxidase complex) into the VII or the XII motor nucleus on the same side. Retrogradely labeled neurons in contact with anterogradely labeled boutons were found throughout the reticular formation with predominance in the parvocellular and intermediate reticular fields. These experiments demonstrate the existence of trigeminal disynaptic influences, via reticular neurons of the pontomedullary reticular formation, in the control of orofacial motor behaviors.

No abstract

This study was undertaken to identify premotor neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) serving as relay neurons between the sensory trigeminal complex (STC) and the facial motor nucleus in rats. Trigemino-solitarii connections were first investigated following injections of anterograde and/or retrograde (biotinylated dextran amine, biocytin, or gold-HRP) tracers in STC or NTS. Trigemino-solitarii neurons were abundant in the ventral and dorsal parts of the STC and of moderate density in its intermediate part. They project throughout the entire rostrocaudal extent of the NTS with a strong lateral preponderance. Solitarii-trigeminal neurons were observed mostly in the rostral and rostrolateral NTS. They mainly project to the ventral and dorsal parts of the spinal trigeminal nucleus but not to the principal nucleus. Additional neurons located in the middle NTS were found to project exclusively to the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars caudalis. No solitarii-trigeminal cells were observed in the caudal NTS. In addition, evidence was obtained of NTS retrogradely labeled neurons contacted by anterogradely labeled trigeminal terminals. Second, solitarii-facial projections were analyzed following injections of anterograde and retrograde tracers into the NTS and the facial nucleus, respectively. NTS neurons, except those of the rostrolateral part, reached the dorsal aspect of the facial nucleus. Finally, simultaneous injections of anterograde tracer in the STC and retrograde tracer in the facial nucleus gave retrogradely labeled neurons in the NTS receiving contacts from anterogradely labeled trigeminal boutons. Thus, the present data demonstrate for the first time the existence of a trigemino-solitarii-facial pathway. This could account for the involvement of the NTS in the control of orofacial motor behaviors.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and chorda tympani (CT) projections onto gustatory neurons of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) in the rat by immunochemical and electrophysiological techniques. IAN afferents were retrogradely labeled. NST neurons were labeled either by retrograde tracer injection into the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) or by c-Fos mapping after CT activation. NST neurons responding to tastant stimulation were recorded in vivo before and after electrical stimulation of the IAN. Results from the immunolabeling approach showed IAN boutons "en passant" apposed to retrogradely labeled neurons from PBN and to CT-activated neurons in the NST. Recordings of single NST neurons showed that the electrical stimulation of the IAN significantly decreased CT gustatory responses. Analysis of these data provides an anatomical and physiological basis to support trigeminal dental and gustatory interactions within the brainstem.