The goal in radiotherapy is to maximize the biological effect (BE) of radiation on the tumour while limiting its toxic effects on healthy anatomies. Treatment is administered over several sessions to give the normal tissue time to recover as it has better damage-repair capabilities than tumour cells. This is termed fractionation. A key problem in radiotherapy involves finding an optimal number of treatment sessions (fractions) and the corresponding dosing schedule. A major limitation of existing mathematically rigorous work on this problem is that it includes only a single normal tissue. Since essentially no anatomical region of interest includes only one normal tissue, these models may incorrectly identify the optimal number of fractions and the corresponding dosing schedule. We present a formulation of the optimal fractionation problem that includes multiple normal tissues. Our model can tackle any combination of maximum dose, mean dose and dose-volume type constraints for serial and parallel normal tissues as this is characteristic of most treatment protocols. We also allow for a spatially heterogeneous dose distribution within each normal tissue. Furthermore, we do not a priori assume that the doses are invariant across fractions. Finally, our model uses a spatially optimized treatment plan as input and hence can be seamlessly combined with any treatment planning system. Our formulation is a mixed-integer, non-convex, quadratically constrained quadratic programming problem. In order to simplify this computationally challenging problem without loss of optimality, we establish sufficient conditions under which equal-dosage or single-dosage fractionation is optimal. Based on the prevalent estimates of tumour and normal tissue model parameters, these conditions are expected to hold in many types of commonly studied tumours, such as those similar to head-and-neck and prostate cancers. This motivates a simple reformulation of our problem that leads to a closed-form formula for the dose per fraction. We then establish that the tumour-BE is quasiconcave in the number of fractions; this ultimately helps in identifying the optimal number of fractions. We perform extensive numerical experiments using 10 head-and-neck and prostate test cases to uncover several clinically relevant insights.
We present a spatiotemporally integrated formulation of the optimal fractionation problem using the standard log-linear-quadratic survival model. Our objective is to choose a fluencemap and a number of fractions so as to maximize the biological effect of tumor dose averaged over its voxels subject to maximum dose, mean dose, and dose-volume constraints for various normal tissues. Constrains are expressed in biologically effective dose equivalents. We propose an efficient convex programming method to approximately solve the resulting computationally difficult model. Through extensive computer simulations on ten head-and-neck and prostate cancer test cases with a broad range of radiobiological parameters, we compare the biological effect on tumor obtained by our integrated approach relative to that from two other models. The first is a traditional IMRT fluence-map optimization model that does not optimize the number of fractions. The second assumes that a fluence-map is available a priori from a traditional IMRT optimization model and then optimizes the number of fractions, thus separating the spatial and temporal components. The improvements in tumor biological effect over IMRT were 9%-52% with average 22%, and 53%-108% with average 69%, for head-and-neck and prostate, respectively. The improvements in tumor biological effect over the spatiotemporally separated model were 15%-45% with average 27%, and 17%-23% with average 21%, for head-and-neck and prostate, respectively. This suggests that integrated optimization of the fluence-map and the number of fractions could improve treatment efficacy as measured within the linear-quadratic framework.
Hypoxia, that is, insufficient oxygen partial pressure, is a known cause of reduced radiosensitivity in solid tumors, and especially in head-and-neck tumors. It is thus believed to adversely affect the outcome of fractionated radiotherapy. Oxygen partial pressure varies spatially and temporally over the treatment course and exhibits inter-patient and intra-tumor variation. Emerging advances in non-invasive functional imaging offer the future possibility of adapting radiotherapy plans to this uncertain spatiotemporal evolution of hypoxia over the treatment course. We study the potential benefits of such adaptive planning via a theoretical stochastic control framework using computer-simulated evolution of hypoxia on computer-generated test cases in head-and-neck cancer. The exact solution of the resulting control problem is computationally intractable. We develop an approximation algorithm, called certainty equivalent control, that calls for the solution of a sequence of convex programs over the treatment course; dose-volume constraints are handled using a simple constraint generation method. These convex programs are solved using an interior point algorithm with a logarithmic barrier via Newton's method and backtracking line search. Convexity of various formulations in this paper is guaranteed by a sufficient condition on radiobiological tumor-response parameters. This condition is expected to hold for head-and-neck tumors and for other similarly responding tumors where the linear dose-response parameter is larger than the quadratic dose-response parameter. We perform numerical experiments on four test cases by using a first-order vector autoregressive process with exponential and rational-quadratic covariance functions from the spatiotemporal statistics literature to simulate the evolution of hypoxia. Our results suggest that dynamic planning could lead to a considerable improvement in the number of tumor cells remaining at the end of the treatment course. Through these simulations, we also gain insights into when and why dynamic planning is likely to yield the largest benefits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.