Pending large prospective studies, the extension of the current surveillance program in MSH2 mutation carriers with the inclusion of the urinary tract should be considered.

No abstract

Background: In view of the high risk of developing a new primary colorectal carcinoma (CRC), subtotal colectomy rather than segmental resection or hemicolectomy is the preferred treatment in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients. Subtotal colectomy however implies a substantial decrease in quality of life. To date, colonoscopic surveillance has been shown to reduce CRC occurrence. Aims: To compare the potential health effects in terms of life expectancy (LE) for patients undergoing subtotal colectomy or hemicolectomy for CRC. Methods: A decision analysis (Markov) model was created. Information on the 10 year risk of CRC after subtotal colectomy (4%) and hemicolectomy (16%) and stages of CRCs detected within a two year surveillance interval (32% Dukes' A, 54% Dukes' B, and 14% Dukes' C) were derived from two cohort studies. Five year survival rates used for the different Dukes stages (A, B, and C) were 98%, 80%, and 60%, respectively. Remaining LE values were calculated for hypothetical cohorts with an age at CRC diagnosis of 27, 47, and 67 years, respectively. Remaining LE values were also calculated for patients with CRC of Dukes' stage A. Results: The overall LE gain of subtotal colectomy compared with hemicolectomy at ages 27, 47, and 67 was 2.3, 1, and 0.3 years, respectively. Specifically for Dukes' stage A, this would be 3.4, 1.5, and 0.4 years. Conclusions: Unless surveillance results improve, subtotal colectomy still seems the preferred treatment for CRC in HNPCC in view of the difference in LE. For older patients, hemicolectomy may be an option as there is no appreciable difference in LE.

No abstract

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is known to be associated with several extracolonic cancers, e.g., cancers of the endometrium, stomach, urinary tract, small bowel and ovary. An association between HNPCC and brain tumours has also been reported, although previous risk analysis did not reveal an excess of this type of tumour. To determine whether HNPCC predisposes patients to brain tumours, we used risk analysis to compare families with HNPCC to those in the general population. Of the 1,321 subjects from 50 HNPCC families (with 60,237 person-years of follow-up) in the Dutch HNPCC Registry which satisfy the Amsterdam Criteria, 312 had colorectal cancer. The registry revealed 14 brain tumours in the HNPCC-patients and their first-degree relatives: 5 astrocytomas, 3 oligodendrogliomas, 1 ependymoma and 5 tumours for which a pathological report was not available. The relative risk of brain tumour in patients with HNPCC and their first-degree relatives was 6 times greater than in the general population (95% confidence interval, 3.5 to 10.1). After exclusion of the cases based only on family history, the relative risk was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 8.0). Although the relative risk of brain tumour was increased, the lifetime risk was low (3.35%). Because it is not certain whether an improvement of the overall prognosis can be achieved by early diagnosis and intervention, and in view of the low lifetime risk, we do not recommend screening for brain tumours in HNPCC families.