Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an important cell surface target in prostate cancer. There are limited data on the heterogeneity of PSMA tissue expression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Furthermore, the mechanisms regulating PSMA expression (encoded by the FOLH1 gene) are not well understood. Here, we demonstrate that PSMA expression is heterogeneous across different metastatic sites and molecular subtypes of mCRPC. In a rapid autopsy cohort in which multiple metastatic sites per patient were sampled, we found that 13 of 52 (25%) cases had no detectable PSMA and 23 of 52 (44%) cases showed heterogeneous PSMA expression across individual metastases, with 33 (63%) cases harboring at least 1 PSMA-negative site. PSMA-negative tumors displayed distinct transcriptional profiles with expression of druggable targets such as MUC1. Loss of PSMA was associated with epigenetic changes of the FOLH1 locus, including gain of CpG methylation and loss of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) acetylation. Treatment with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors reversed this epigenetic repression and restored PSMA expression in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, these data provide insights into the expression patterns and regulation of PSMA in mCRPC and suggest that epigenetic therapies — in particular, HDAC inhibitors — can be used to augment PSMA levels.

Purpose: To determine if metastatic castration resistant prostate cancers (mCRPCs) partition into molecular phenotypes corresponding to intrinsic differentiation states and ascertain whether these subtypes exhibit specific druggable features and associate with treatment outcomes. Experimental Design: We used RNAseq, digital spatial profiling, and histological assessments from metastatic biopsies and patient derived xenografts to segregate mCRPCs into subtypes defined by the PAM50 breast cancer classification algorithm. Subtype associations with treatment responses in preclinical models and patients were determined. Results: Using the PAM50 algorithm we partitioned 270 mCRPC tumors into LumA (42%), LumB (24%) and Basal (34%) subtypes with classification largely driven by proliferation rates and androgen receptor (AR) activity. Most neuroendocrine tumors classified as Basal. Pathways enriched in the LumA subtype include TGFß and NOTCH signaling. LumB subtype tumors were notable for elevated MYC activity. Basal subtype tumors exhibited elevated IL6-STAT3 signaling and features of adult stem cell states. In patients where multiple tumors were evaluated, the majority had concordant PAM50 subtype determination, though a subset exhibited marked inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity including divergent classifications between primary and metastatic sites. In preclinical models, LumA subtype tumors were responsive to androgen deprivation and docetaxel chemotherapy whereas Basal tumors were largely resistant. In clinical cohorts patients with Basal tumors demonstrated a shorter time on treatment with AR signaling inhibitors and docetaxel relative to patients with luminal subtypes. Conclusions: Subtyping of mCRPC based on cell differentiation states has potential clinical utility for identifying patients with divergent expression of treatment targets and responses to systemic therapy.

No abstract

Background: Amphicrine prostate carcinoma (AMPC) is a poorly defined subset of prostate cancer in which cells co-express luminal prostate epithelial and neuroendocrine markers. The optimal treatment strategy is unknown. We sought to further characterize the clinical, histomorphologic, and molecular characteristics of AMPC and to identify areas of potential future treatment investigations.Methods: We retrospectively identified 17 cases of AMPC at a single institution, defined as synaptophysin expression in >70% of cells and co-expression of androgen receptor (AR) signaling markers (either AR, PSA, or NKX3.1) in >50% of cells. Clinical and histologic features of AMPC cases as well as response to treatment and clinical outcomes were described.Results: Five AMPC cases arose de novo in the absence of prior systemic treatment and behaved distinctly from cases that were treatment-emergent. In these de novo cases, despite expression of neuroendocrine markers, prognosis appeared more favorable than high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, with two (40%) patients with de novo metastatic disease, universal response to androgen deprivation therapy, and no deaths at a median follow-up of 12.3 months.Treatment-emergent AMPC arose a median of 41.1 months after androgen deprivation therapy initiation and was associated with poor response to therapy. Conclusions:We show that amphicrine prostate cancer is a unique entity and differs in clinical and molecular features from high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the prostate. Our study highlights the need to recognize AMPC as a unique molecularly defined subgroup of prostate cancer.

No abstract