It is well known that hyperphenylalaninemia caused by phenylketonuria (PKU) negatively influences cognitive performance. Several tests have been used to study these functions. Until now, no universal, optimal tool has been developed for detecting PKU-caused brain dysfunctions. Using computerized neuropsychological tests during daily routine would be helpful for screening subclinical brain deficits in adult PKU patients. In a monocentric, cross-sectional study, adult patients with PKU (n = 46; median age = 29.5 years; female/male ratio = 21/25) were tested with the computerized Cambridge Cognition (CANTAB) test measuring neurocognitive functions. Patients were divided into two groups: The "on diet" group included patients whose blood Phe-level was under 600 μmol/l (n = 20), and the "loose diet" group included patients whose blood Phe-level was above 600 μmol/l (n = 26) at the examination time. The results of the PKU-affected individuals were compared with a healthy control group (n = 31; median age = 25 years; female/male ratio = 11/20). Compared with the control group, PKU patients had significantly worse test results in memory, problem-solving skills, and strategy. However, there were no significant differences in response speed or initial thinking time. There was no correlation between the blood Phe-level, tyrosine (Tyr)-level or Phe/Tyr ratio and the different cognitive test results. There were no significant differences in test results between the two PKU subgroups. Several cognitive functions measured by CANTAB are negatively influenced by hyperphenylalaninemia in adult PKU patients. However, response speed and initial thinking time were not impaired as seriously as other functions. Patients with lower Phe-levels failed to achieve better test results than patients whose Phe-levels were notably elevated.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundPatients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation during major abdominal surgery commonly develop pulmonary atelectasis and/or hyperdistention of the lungs. Recent studies show benefits of lung-protective mechanical ventilation with the use of low tidal volumes, a moderate level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment maneuvers during general anesthesia, even in patients with healthy lungs. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of intraoperative lung-protective mechanical ventilation, using individualized PEEP values, on postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response.Methods/designA total number of 40 patients with bladder cancer undergoing open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (ileal conduit or orthotopic bladder substitute) will be enrolled and randomized into a study (SG) and a control group (CG). Standard lung-protective ventilation with a PEEP of 6 cmH2O will be applied in the CG and an optimal PEEP value determined during a static pulmonary compliance (Cstat)-directed PEEP titration procedure will be used in the SG. Low tidal volumes (6 mL/Kg ideal bodyweight) and a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5 will be applied in both groups. After surgery both groups will receive standard postoperative management. Primary endpoints are postoperative pulmonary complications and serum procalcitonin kinetics during and after surgery until the third postoperative day. Secondary and tertiary endpoints will be: organ dysfunction as monitored by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, in-hospital stay, 28-day and in-hospital mortality.DiscussionThis trial will assess the possible benefits or disadvantages of an individualized lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy during open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion regarding postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02931409. Registered on 5 October 2016.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2116-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Applying lung protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) during general anaesthesia even in patients with non-injured lungs is recommended. However, the effects of an individual PEEP-optimisation on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation and their potential correlation with the inflammatory response and postoperative complications have not been evaluated have not been compared to standard LPV in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Thirty-nine patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were enrolled in this study. In the study group (SG) optimal PEEP was determined by a decremental titration procedure and defined as the PEEP value resulting the highest static pulmonary compliance. In the control group (CG) PEEP was set to 6 cmH2O. Primary endpoints were intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange parameters. Secondary outcomes were perioperative procalcitonin kinetics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Optimal PEEP levels (median = 10, range: 8-14 cmH2O), PaO2/FiO2 (451.24 ± 121.78 mmHg vs. 404.15 ± 115.87 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static pulmonary compliance (52.54 ± 13.59 ml cmH2O-1 vs. 45.22 ± 9.13 ml cmH2O-1, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher, while driving pressure (8.26 ± 1.74 cmH2O vs. 9.73 ± 4.02 cmH2O, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower in the SG as compared to the CG. No significant intergroup differences were found in procalcitonin kinetics (P = 0.076). Composite outcome results indicated a non-significant reduction of postoperative complications in the SG. Intraoperative PEEP-optimization resulted in significant improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics as compared to standard LPV. Whether these have any effect on short and long term outcomes require further investigations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02931409.