There is a need for prognostic markers to select patients most likely to benefit from antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) therapy. We quantified the relationship between pretreatment PET imaging of glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma B (gpNMB) with 89Zr-labeled anti-gpNMB antibody ([89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011) and response to ADC therapy (CDX-011) in triple-negative breast cancer. First, we compared different PET imaging metrics and found that standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-heart SUV ratios were sufficient to delineate differences in radiotracer uptake in the tumor of four different cell- and patient-derived tumor models and achieved high standardized effect sizes. These tumor models with varying levels of gpNMB expression were imaged with [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 followed by treatment with a single bolus injection of CDX-011. The percent change in tumor volume relative to baseline (% CTV) was then correlated with SUVmean of [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 uptake in the tumor. All gpNMB-positive tumor models responded to CDX-011 over 6 weeks of treatment, except one patient-derived tumor regrew after 4 weeks of treatment. As expected, the gpNMB-negative tumor increased in volume by 130 ± 59% at endpoint. The magnitude of pretreatment SUV had the strongest inverse correlation with the % CTV at 2–4 weeks after treatment with CDX-011 (Spearman ρ = −0.8). However, pretreatment PET imaging with [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 did not inform on which tumor types will regrow over time. Other methods will be needed to predict resistance to treatment.

The successful development and translation of PET imaging agents targeting β-amyloid plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau tangles have allowed for in vivo detection of these hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) antemortem. Amyloid and tau PET have been incorporated into the A/T/N scheme for AD characterization and have become an integral part of ongoing clinical trials to screen patients for enrollment, prove drug action mechanisms, and monitor therapeutic effects. Meanwhile, preclinical PET imaging in animal models of AD can provide supportive information for mechanistic studies. With the recent advancement of gene editing technologies and AD animal model development, preclinical PET imaging in AD models will further facilitate our understanding of AD pathogenesis/progression and the development of novel treatments. In this study, we review the current state-of-the-art in preclinical PET imaging using animal models of AD and suggest future research directions.

Supplementary Table from [⁸⁹Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 PET Correlates with Response to Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma B–targeted Therapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Supplementary Figure from [⁸⁹Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 PET Correlates with Response to Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma B–targeted Therapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Supplementary Data from [⁸⁹Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 PET Correlates with Response to Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma B–targeted Therapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer