Sclerotherapy of hemangiomas is a relatively simple, effective, and inexpensive method that is a valuable and promising treatment.
The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma is widely established. Preoperative cutaneous lymphoscintigraphic mapping is a reliable method for identifying the nodal basins at risk of metastases in melanomas. In this prospective study we investigated the correlation between the scintigraphic appearance time and the metastatic involvement of sentinel lymph nodes. In 276 malignant melanoma patients (137 women, 139 men; age 16-93 years), dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy was performed after strict intracutaneous application of technetium-99m nanocolloid (40-150 MBq; 0.05 ml/deposit) around the tumour or biopsy scar. Analysis of dynamic scans primarily focussed on the appearance time of sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node visualisation =20 min post injection was defined as fast drainage, and visualisation >20 min as slow drainage. Fast lymphatic drainage was found in 236 patients, of whom 34 (14.4%) had sentinel lymph node metastases. Twenty-two patients showed hybrid (fast and slow) lymphatic drainage, and eight (36.4%) of them had sentinel lymph node metastases. Seven of the latter demonstrated fast lymphatic drainage, while one showed one positive sentinel lymph node with fast and another with slow drainage. The melanomas of 18 patients demonstrated exclusively slow lymphatic drainage, in all cases without sentinel lymph node metastases. This prospective study indicates that the scintigraphic appearance time of sentinel lymph nodes seems to be a clinically relevant factor for prediction of metastatic spread of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Larger numbers of patients need to be examined to truly assess the benefit of the scintigraphic appearance time compared with other predictors of sentinel lymph node tumour positivity.
Detection of the "true" sentinel lymph nodes, permitting correct staging of regional lymph nodes, is essential for management and prognostic assessment in malignant melanoma. In this study, it was prospectively evaluated whether simple temporary shielding of hot spots in lymphatic drainage areas could improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node diagnostics. In 100 consecutive malignant melanoma patients (45 women, 55 men; age 11-91 years), dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy in various views was performed after strict intracutaneous application of technetium-99m nanocolloid (40-150 MBq; 0.05 ml/deposit) around the tumour (31 patients) or the biopsy scar (69 patients, safety distance 1 cm). The images were acquired with and without temporary lead shielding of the most prominent hot spots in the drainage area. In 33/100 patients, one or two additional sentinel lymph nodes that showed less tracer accumulation or were smaller (<1.5 cm) were detected after shielding. Four of these patients had metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes; the non-sentinel lymph nodes were tumour negative. In 3/100 patients, hot spots in the drainage area proved to be lymph vessels, lymph vessel intersections or lymph vessel ectasias after temporary shielding; hence, a node interpreted as a non-sentinel lymph node at first glance proved to be the real sentinel lymph node. In two of these patients, lymph node metastasis was histologically confirmed; the non-sentinel lymph nodes were tumour free. In 7/100 patients the exact course of lymph vessels could be mapped after shielding. In one of these patients, two additional sentinel lymph nodes (with metastasis) were detected. Overall, in 43/100 patients the temporary shielding yielded additional information, with sentinel lymph node metastases in 7%. In conclusion, when used in combination with dynamic acquisition in various views, temporary shielding of prominent hot spots in the drainage area of a malignant melanoma of the skin leads to an improvement in the accuracy of identification and localisation of sentinel lymph nodes by lymphoscintigraphy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.