[1] This paper describes regional methods for assessing field significance and regional consistency for trend detection in hydrological extremes. Four procedures for assessing field significance are compared on the basis of Monte Carlo simulations. Then three regional tests, based on a regional variable, on the regional average Mann-Kendall test, and a new semiparametric approach, are tested. The latter was found to be the most adequate to detect consistent changes within homogeneous hydro-climatic regions. Finally, these procedures are applied to France, using daily discharge data arising from 195 gauging stations. No generalized change was found at the national scale on the basis of the field significance assessment of at-site results. Hydro-climatic regions were then defined, and the semiparametric procedure applied. Most of the regions showed no consistent change, but three exceptions were found: in the northeast flood peaks were found to increase, in the Pyrenees high and low flows showed decreasing trends, and in the Alps, earlier snowmelt-related floods were detected, along with less severe drought and increasing runoff due to glacier melting. The trend affecting floods in the northeast was compared to changes in rainfall, using rainfall-runoff simulation. The results showed flood trends consistent with the observed rainfall.

Abstract. This paper presents a probabilistic model for daily rainfall, using sub-sampling based on meteorological circulation. We classified eight typical but contrasted synoptic situations (weather patterns) for France and surrounding areas, using a "bottom-up" approach, i.e. from the shape of the rain field to the synoptic situations described by geopotential fields. These weather patterns (WP) provide a discriminating variable that is consistent with French climatology, and allows seasonal rainfall records to be split into more homogeneous sub-samples, in term of meteorological genesis.First results show how the combination of seasonal and WP sub-sampling strongly influences the identification of the asymptotic behaviour of rainfall probabilistic models. Furthermore, with this level of stratification, an asymptotic exponential behaviour of each sub-sample appears as a reasonable hypothesis. This first part is illustrated with two daily rainfall records from SE of France.The distribution of the multi-exponential weather patterns (MEWP) is then defined as the composition, for a given season, of all WP sub-sample marginal distributions, weighted by the relative frequency of occurrence of each WP. This model is finally compared to Exponential and Generalized Pareto distributions, showing good features in terms of robustness and accuracy. These final statistical results are computed from a wide dataset of 478 rainfall chronicles spread on the southern half of France. All these data cover the 1953-2005 period.

Abstract. This paper presents a new probabilistic model for daily rainfall, using sub-sampling based on meteorological circulation. We classified eight typical but contrasted synoptic situations (weather patterns) for France and surrounding areas, using a "bottom-up" approach, i.e. from the shape of the rain field to the synoptic situations described by geopotential fields. These weather patterns (WP) provide a discriminating variable that is consistent with French climatology, and allows seasonal rainfall records to be split into more homogeneous sub-samples. An exponential POT model is used to fit the distribution of each sub-sample. The distribution of the multi-exponential weather patterns (MEWP) is then defined as the composition, for a given season, of all WP sub-sample marginal distributions, weighted by the relative frequency of occurrence of each WP. The MEWP distribution appears able to fit various shapes of distributions using a simple and robust approach for asymptotic behaviour. It is a new contribution to the ongoing debate on the probabilistic tools used to study the asymptotic behaviour of extreme rainfall from observed records. The paper is illustrated throughout with the example of the Lyon (France) rainfall record for the period 1953–2005.

No abstract

[1] An abundance of methods have been developed over the years to perform the frequency analysis (FA) of extreme environmental variables. Although numerous comparisons between these methods have been implemented, no general comparison framework has been agreed upon so far. The objective of this paper is to build the foundation of a data-based comparison framework, which aims at complementing more standard comparison schemes based on Monte Carlo simulations or statistical testing. This framework is based on the following general principles: (i) emphasis is put on the predictive ability of competing FA implementations, rather than their sole descriptive ability measured by some goodness-of-fit criterion; (ii) predictive ability is quantified by means of reliability indices, describing the consistency between validation data (not used for calibration) and FA predictions; (iii) stability is also quantified, i.e., the ability of a FA implementation to yield similar estimates when calibration data change; and (iv) the necessity to subject uncertainty estimates to the same scrutiny as point estimates is recognized, and a practical approach based on the use of the predictive distribution is proposed for this purpose. This framework is then applied to a case study involving 364 gauging stations in France, where 10 FA implementations are compared. These implementations correspond to the local, regional, and local-regional estimation of Gumbel and generalized extreme value distributions. Results show that reliability and stability indices are able to reveal marked differences between FA implementations. Moreover, the case study also confirms that using the predictive distribution to indirectly scrutinize uncertainty estimates is a viable approach, with distinct FA implementations showing marked differences in the reliability of their uncertainty estimates. The proposed comparison framework therefore constitutes a valuable tool to compare the predictive reliability of competing FA implementations, along with the reliability of their uncertainty estimates.