Although expert consensus states that critical thinking (CT) is essential to enquiry, it doesn’t necessarily follow that by practicing enquiry children are developing CT skills. Philosophy with children programmes around the world aim to develop CT dispositions and skills through a community of enquiry, and this study compared the impact of the explicit teaching of CT skills during an enquiry, to The Philosophy Foundation's philosophical enquiry (PhiE) method alone (which had no explicit teaching of CT skills). Philosophy with children is also said to improve metacognitive (MC) skills but there is little research into this claim. Following observable problems with ensuring genuine metacognition was happening in PhiE sessions - on a reasonably strong understanding of what metacognition is – a method has been developed and trialed in this study to bring together, in mutual support, the development of critical thinking and metacognitive skills. Based on the work of Peter Worley and Ellen Fridland (KCL)The Philosophy Foundation ran an experimental study with King's College London in Autumn 2017 and Autumn 2018 to compare the impact of teaching CT skills and MC skills against classes which just have philosophical enquiry. The approach developed and used for the study employs the explicit teaching of some CT and MC skills within the context of a philosophical enquiry (as opposed to stand-alone teaching of these skills) and yields some positive findings both qualitative and quantitative. Both studies took place over one term (12 weeks) and a control and intervention group were used in each study. This report focuses on the second year of the study, with 220 ten and eleven-year-old children involved in eight classes across three state schools in South East London. Although there were limitations to the study the results indicate that the explicit teaching of these skills during a philosophical enquiry can help children use CT and MC skills more successfully than philosophical enquiry alone.
Background
Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)‐mediated vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation and migration play an important role in vascular injury‐induced neointima formation and subsequent vascular restenosis, a major event that hinders the long‐term success of angioplasty. The function of β3‐adrenergic receptors (β3‐ARs) in vascular injury‐induced neointima formation has not yet been defined.
Objectives
Our current study explored the possible role of β3‐ARs in vascular injury‐induced neointima formation by testing its effects on bFGF‐induced VSMC migration and proliferation.
Methods
β3‐AR expression in rat carotid arteries was examined at 14 days following a balloon catheter‐induced injury. The effects of β3‐AR activation on bFGF‐induced rat aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and signaling transduction (including extracellular‐signal‐regulated kinase/ mitogen activated protein kinase, ERK/MAPK and Protein kinase B, AKT) were tested.
Results
We found that vascular injury induced upregulation of β3‐ARs in neointima. Pretreatment of VSMCs with a selective β3‐AR agonist, CL316,243 significantly potentiated bFGF‐induced cell migration and proliferation, and ERK and AKT phosphorylation. Our results also revealed that suppressing phosphorylation of ERK and AKT blocked bFGF‐induced cell migration and that inhibiting AKT phosphorylation reduced bFGF‐mediated cell proliferation.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that activation of β3‐ARs enhances bFGF‐mediated effects on VSMCs by interacting with bFGF‐mediated ERK and AKT phosphorylation and β3‐ARs may play a role in vascular injury‐induced neointima formation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.