(2014) Safety and efficacy of aerobic training in operable breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A phase II randomized trial, Acta Oncologica, 53:1, 65-74,

Purpose To evaluate the effects of exercise therapy on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients with adult-onset cancer. Secondary objectives were to evaluate treatment effect modifiers, safety, and fidelity. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify RCTs that compared exercise therapy to a nonexercise control group. The primary end point was change in CRF as evaluated by peak oxygen consumption (VO; in mL O × kg × min) from baseline to postintervention. Subgroup analyses evaluated whether treatment effects differed as a function of exercise prescription (ie, modality, schedule, length, supervision), study characteristics (ie, intervention timing, primary cancer site), and publication year. Safety was defined as report of any adverse event (AE); fidelity was evaluated by rates of attendance, adherence, and loss to follow-up. Results Forty-eight unique RCTs that represented 3,632 patients (mean standard deviation age, 55 ± 7.5 years; 68% women); 1,990 (55%) and 1,642 (45%) allocated to exercise therapy and control/usual care groups, respectively, were evaluated. Exercise therapy was associated with a significant increase in CRF (+2.80 mL O × kg × min) compared with no change (+0.02 mL O × kg × min) in the control group (weighted mean differences, +2.13 mL O × kg × min; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.67; I, 20.6; P < .001). No statistical significant differences were observed on the basis of any treatment effect modifiers. Thirty trials (63%) monitored AEs; a total of 44 AEs were reported. The mean standard deviation loss to follow-up, attendance, and adherence rates were 11% ± 13%, 84% ± 12%, and 88% ± 32%, respectively. Conclusion Exercise therapy is an effective adjunctive therapy to improve CRF in patients with cancer. Our findings support the recommendation of exercise therapy for patients with adult-onset cancer.

The feasibility of symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) prior to allo-SCT was assessed in addition to the prognostic value of CPET-derived measures. CPET was performed prospectively on 21 patients with hematologic malignancies, with assessments of peak (for example, peak oxygen consumption, VO2peak) and submaximal (for example, ventilatory threshold (VT)) measures of cardiopulmonary function. No serious adverse events were observed during CPET procedures, with 95% of patients achieving criteria for a peak test. Mean VO2peak was 24.7±6.4 mL kg−1min−1 (range: 10.9–35.5), equivalent to 29%±17% below that of age-matched healthy controls. All patients proceeded with the conditioning regimen followed by allo-SCT. Median follow-up was 25 months. During this period, 11 (52.4%) patients died (n = 6, relapsed disease; n = 5, non-relapse mortality (NRM)); 9 patients (43%) developed pulmonary toxicity. In univariate analyses, both peak and submaximal markers of cardiopulmonary function were predictors of OS, pulmonary toxicity and NRM. For OS, the HR for VO2peak and VT were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.8–0.99, P = 0.04) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71–0.98, P = 0.03), respectively. In conclusion, CPET is safe and feasible prior to allo-SCT. Patients have marked impairments in cardiopulmonary function prior to allo-SCT. CPET-derived metrics may complement conventional measures to improve risk stratification.

Background: Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CTRT) improves disease-free survival in locally advanced head and neck cancer but is associated with numerous acute and chronic toxicities resulting in substantial alterations in body mass and composition. We aim to summarize the current evidence on body composition changes experienced by patients undergoing CTRT, examine the impact of these changes on clinical outcomes and address potential interventions aimed at mitigating the loss. Main Body: Loss of 20 % of pre-CTRT weight predicts poorer treatment tolerance and 30-day mortality. While clinical practice focuses on body weight, emerging data indicates that CTRT causes profound adverse changes in lean body mass (sarcopenia). Higher prevalence of sarcopenia predicts poorer disease-free survival as well as overall survival, lower quality of life and functional performance. The magnitude of CTRT-induced sarcopenia is the equivalent to that observed in a decade of aging in a healthy adult. Alterations in body composition are only explained, in part, by decreased caloric intake; other significant predictors include body mass index, stage, and dysphagia. Lifestyle interventions aimed at preventing loss of whole-body and especially lean mass include nutritional counseling, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements and exercise training. Personalized nutritional counseling has been associated with improvement in quality of life, while the benefits of feeding tube placement are inconsistent. There are inconsistently reported benefits of resistance training in this population. Conclusion: Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing CTRT therapy experience dramatic shifts in body composition, including sarcopenia, which can negatively impact clinical outcomes. Efforts to understand the magnitude, clinical importance and mechanisms of sarcopenia are needed to inform a more personalized approach to mitigating the body composition changes associated with CTRT.

Changes in body composition can be measured from routine thoracic imaging. During chemotherapy skeletal muscle volume and metabolism are altered; however, there was no impact on survival in this retrospective series, and further validation in prospective, well-controlled studies are required.