No abstract

Purpose This is a cross‐sectional clinical study to evaluate crestal bone levels, mucosal margin position, probing depths, bleeding on probing, and plaque and bleeding indices of implants restored with an immediate impression workflow compared to implants restored with a delayed impression workflow. Materials and methods Patients who had received a posterior single implant crown in the premolar and molar regions were identified and scheduled for a single‐visit study appointment. Outcome measurements included soft tissues peri‐implant indices, peri‐implant mucosal margin position, and crestal bone levels. Several systemic‐, local‐, and prosthesis‐related factors were recorded. Bitewing radiographs were used to assess crestal bone levels. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the medians of continuous measurements and Pearson chi‐square test (or Fisher's exact test) was used to compare the distributions of categorical variables between the two groups. Results Twenty eight patients were included. Crestal bone levels, peri‐implant mucosal margin position and peri‐implant soft tissue parameters for the immediately impressed group were not statistically different from the delayed impressed group, except for probing depth for the immediately impressed buccal site, which was less than that of the delayed group. Mesial bone level for cement‐retained crowns was significantly more coronal than for screw‐retained ones. Conclusions While an isolated statistical difference was found in probing depth, the current study suggests that there is no clinically significant difference between implants impressed with immediate and delayed implant workflows when considering crestal bone levels, peri‐implant mucosal margin position, and most peri‐implant indices.

No abstract