The largest contribution of oceanic heat to the Arctic Ocean is the warm Atlantic Water (AW) inflow through the deep Fram Strait. The AW current also carries Atlantic plankton into the Arctic Basin and this inflow of zooplankton biomass through the Atlantic-Arctic gateway far exceeds the inflow through the shallow Pacific-Arctic gateway. However, because this transport has not yet been adequately quantified based on observational data, the present contribution is poorly defined, and future changes in Arctic zooplankton communities are difficult to project and observe. Our objective was to quantify the inflow of zooplankton biomass through the Fram Strait during different seasons, including winter. We collected data with high spatial resolution covering hydrography (CTD), currents (ADCP and LADCP) and zooplankton distributions (LOPC and MultiNet) from surface to 1,000 m depth along two transects crossing the AW inflow during three cruises in January, May and August 2014. Long-term variations (1997 in the AW inflow were analyzed based on moored current meters. Water transport across the inflow region was of the same order of magnitude during all months (January 2.2 Sv, May 1.9 Sv, August 1.7 Sv). We found a higher variability in zooplankton transport between the months (January 51 kg C s −1 , May 34 kg C s −1 , August 50 kg C s −1 ), related to seasonal changes in the vertical distribution of zooplankton. However, high abundances of carbon-rich copepods were observed in the AW inflow during all months. Surface patches with high abundances of C. finmarchicus, Microcalanus spp., Pseudocalanus spp., and Oithona similis clearly contributed to the advected biomass, also in winter. The data reveal that the phenology of species is important for the amount of advected biomass, and that the advective input of zooplankton carbon into the Arctic Basin is important during all seasons. The advective zooplankton input might be especially important for mesopelagic planktivorous predators that were recently observed in the region, particularly during winter. The inflow of C. finmarchicus with AW was estimated to be in the order of 500,000 metric tons C y −1 , which compares well to modeled estimates.

The abundance and distribution of overwintering Calanus finmarchicus in the NE Norwegian Sea and shelf waters off North Norway was studied during January for 2000–02. Depth integrated distribution of C. finmarchicus CV showed aggregations with high abundances in the Lofoten Basin and southwest of Tromsøflaket for all three years. The exact location of the aggregation areas and the maximum abundances did, however, vary between the years. The concentrations southwest of Tromsøflaket were almost twofold higher in 2000 at 150 000 ind. m−2 compared to 70 000 and 90 000 ind. m−2 in 2001 and 2002, respectively. Vertical distribution of the animals was similar for the three years, with most of the CVs of the population residing in the depth interval between 700 and 1200 m. Peak abundances of 350 ind. m−3 were found at 850–1000 m west of Tromsøflaket in 2000, whereas in 2001 the maximum abundances were located in the Lofoten Basin at 700–900 m, in the order of 150 ind. m−3. In 2002, the highest concentration of animals was found west of Vesterålen between 1100 and 1200 m, with a concentration of 385 ind. m−3. The vertical and horizontal distribution of C. finmarchicus CV closely followed the hydrographic structures in the area, with the highest abundances associated with cold (<2°C), less saline (34.85–34.9) water with a density of 27.95–28. The patches of high abundance were located in confined areas along the continental shelf slope and in the Lofoten Basin, indicating that the animals may have been extracted from the highly flushed surface areas in late summer during their ontogenetic descent, and trapped in mesoscale physical features in the deep‐water masses throughout the winter. We argue that deep‐water mesoscale anticyclonic eddies, which are frequently formed along the continental slope and in the Lofoten Basin, may provide favourable retention areas for the overwintering population of C. finmarchicus. Consequently, the impact of ocean climate as well as more regional and local effects on the creation and persistence of these mesoscale features is likely to influence the Calanus abundance and advection paths in the following spring and summer.

No abstract

The Arctic Ocean is changing rapidly with respect to ice cover extent and volume, growth season duration and biological production. Zooplankton are important components in the arctic marine food web, and tightly coupled to the strong seasonality in primary production. In this study, we investigate zooplankton composition, including microzooplankton, copepod nauplii, as well as small and large copepod taxa, and primary productivity in the dynamic Atlantic water inflow area north of Svalbard in May and August 2014. We focus on seasonal differences in the zooplankton community and in primary productivity regimes. More specifically, we examine how a shift from "new" (nitrate based) spring bloom to a "regenerated" (ammonium based) post bloom primary production is reflected in the diversity, life history adaptations and productivity of the dominant zooplankton. North of Svalbard, the seasonal differences in planktonic communities were significant. In spring, the large copepod Calanus finmarchicus dominated, but the estimated production and ingestion rates were low compared to the total primary production. In summer, the zooplankton community was composed of microzooplankton and the small copepod Oithona similis. The zooplankton production and ingestion rates were high in summer, and probably depended heavily on the regenerated primary production associated with the microbial loop. There was clear alteration from dominance of calanoid copepod nauplii in spring to Oithona spp. nauplii in summer, which indicates different reproductive strategies of the dominating large and small copepod species. Our study confirms the dependence and tight coupling between the new (spring bloom) primary production and reproductive adaptations of C. glacialis and C. hyperboreus. In contrast, C. finmarchicus appears able to take advantage of the regenerated summer primary production, which allows it to reach the overwintering stage within one growth season in this region north of Svalbard. This suggests that C. finmarchicus will be able to profit from the predicted increased primary production

No abstract