No abstract

Skin-sparing (SSM) and nipple-sparing (NSM) mastectomies relatively new conservative surgical approaches to breast cancer. In SSM most of the breast skin is conserved to create a pocket that facilitates immediate breast reconstruction with implant or autologous graft to achieve a quality cosmetic outcome. NSM is closely similar except that the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is also conserved. Meta-analyses indicate that outcomes for SSM and NSM do not differ from those for non-conservative mastectomies. Recurrence rates in the NAC after NSM are acceptably low (0-3.7%). Other studies indicate that NSM is associated with high patient satisfaction and good psychological adjustment. Indications are carcinoma or DCIS that require mastectomy (including after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). NSM is also suitable for women undergoing risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. Tumor not less than 2cm from the NAC is recommended, but may be less important than no evidence of nipple involvement on mandatory intraoperative nipple margin assessment. A positive margin is an absolute contraindication for nipple preservation. Other contraindications are microcalcifications close to the subareolar region and a positive nipple discharge. Complication rates are similar to those for other types of post-mastectomy reconstructions. The main complication of NSM is NAC necrosis, however as surgeon experience matures, frequency declines. Factors associated with complications are voluminous breast, ptosis, smoking, obesity, and radiotherapy. Since the access incision is small, breast tissue may be left behind, so only experienced breast surgeons should do these operations; close collaboration with the plastic surgeon. For breast cancer patients requiring mastectomy, NSM should be the option of choice.

No abstract

The findings in this large series, with a median follow-up of nearly 8 years, indicate that NSM is oncologically safe for selected patients. The rate of NAC loss was acceptably low.

Granular cell tumor is a rare condition that occasionally affects breast parenchyma: approximately, 5%-15% of all granular cell tumors represent 1:1000 of breast tumors. In this study, we reported a consecutive series of 12 patients with primary granular cell tumor of the breast observed at our institute, focusing attention on preoperative management, surgical approach, and long-term follow-up. Eight cases (8/12; 66.78%) presented with left-breast tumors; in the majority of patients (11/12; 91.7%), the lesion was identified in one of the upper quadrants. Specifically, upper intern quadrants (10 cases) were more affected. Surgical excision was performed in all patients. Mean diameter at pathologic section was 11.4 mm (range: 5-22). Tumor relapse was reported only in one case (8.3%). Mean follow-up was 98.1 months (range: 1-192). We proposed a model to explain the molecular mechanism of granular cell tumorigenesis associating to the high level of S100 protein. Management of primary granular cell tumor of the breast requires a correct initial diagnosis using breast imaging associated with core biopsy. Surgical procedure with wide resection or quadrantectomy requires a careful evaluation of breast margins.