Objectives Dendritic cells play a pivotal but still enigmatic role in the control of tumor development. Composed of specialised subsets (cDC1s, cDC2s, pDCs), DCs are critical in triggering and shaping antitumor immune responses. Yet, tumors exploit plasticity of DCs to subvert their functions and escape from immune control. This challenging controversy prompted us to explore the pathophysiological role of cDCs and pDCs in melanoma, where their precise and coordinated involvement remains to be deciphered. Methods We investigated in melanoma patients the phenotypic and functional features of circulating and tumor‐infiltrating BDCA1+ cDC2s, BDCA2+ pDCs and BDCA3+ cDC1s and assessed their clinical impact. Results Principal component analyses (PCA) based on phenotypic or functional parameters of DC subsets revealed intra‐group clustering, highlighting specific features of DCs in blood and tumor infiltrate of patients compared to healthy donors. DC subsets exhibited perturbed frequencies in the circulation and actively infiltrated the tumor site, while harbouring a higher activation status. Whereas cDC2s and pDCs displayed an altered functionality in response to TLR triggering, circulating and tumor‐infiltrating cDC1s preserved potent competences associated with improved prognosis. Notably, the proportion of circulating cDC1s predicted the clinical outcome of melanoma patients. Conclusion Such understanding uncovers critical and distinct impact of each DC subset on clinical outcomes and unveils fine‐tuning of interconnections between DCs in melanoma. Elucidating the mechanisms of DC subversion by tumors could help designing new therapeutic strategies exploiting the potentialities of these powerful immune players and their cross‐talks, while counteracting their skewing by tumors, to achieve immune control and clinical success.

Subversion of immunity by tumors is a crucial step for their development. Dendritic cells (DCs) are strategic immune cells that orchestrate anti-tumor immune responses but display altered functions in cancer. The bases for such DCs’ hijacking are not fully understood. Tumor cells harbor unusual glycosylation patterns of surface glycoproteins and glycolipids. DCs express glycan-binding receptors, named C-type lectin receptors (CLR), allowing them to sense changes in glycan signature of their environment, and subsequently trigger a response. Recognition of tumor glycans by CLRs is crucial for DCs to shape antitumor immunity, and decisive in the orientation of the response. Yet the status of the CLR machinery on DCs in cancer, especially melanoma, remained largely unknown. We explored CLR expression patterns on circulating and tumor-infiltrating cDC1s, cDC2s, and pDCs of melanoma patients, assessed their clinical relevance, and further depicted the correlations between CLR expression profiles and DCs’ features. For the first time, we highlighted that the CLR repertoire of circulating and tumor-infiltrating cDC1s, cDC2s, and pDCs was strongly perturbed in melanoma patients, with modulation of DCIR, CLEC-12α and NKp44 on circulating DCs, and perturbation of Dectin-1, CD206, DEC205, DC-SIGN and CLEC-9α on tumor-infiltrating DCs. Furthermore, melanoma tumor cells directly altered CLR expression profiles of healthy DC subsets, and this was associated with specific glycan patterns (Man, Fuc, GlcNAc) that may interact with DCs through CLR molecules. Notably, specific CLR expression profiles on DC subsets correlated with unique DCs’ activation status and functionality and were associated with clinical outcome of melanoma patients. Higher proportions of DCIR-, DEC205-, CLEC-12α-expressing cDCs were linked with a better survival, whereas elevated proportions of CD206-, Dectin1-expressing cDCs and NKp44-expressing pDCs were associated with a poor outcome. Thus, melanoma tumor may shape DCs’ features by exploiting the plasticity of the CLR machinery. Our study revealed that melanoma manipulates CLR pathways to hijack DC subsets and escape from immune control. It further paved the way to exploit glycan-lectin interactions for the design of innovative therapeutic strategies, which exploit DCs’ potentialities while avoiding hijacking by tumor, to properly reshape anti-tumor immunity by manipulating the CLR machinery.