RESUMO
ABSTRACT Introduction:In Tocantins, the behavior of malaria differs between microregions, with predominance of imported cases. This study describes a spatial analysis on malaria in the state covering 2003 to 2008, which sought to identify the incidence of autochthonous and imported cases, and the origin of the latter, in the microregions. Methods: This was a retrospective study using secondary data. The data source was the epidemiological surveillance information system for malaria (SIVEP-Malária), and the data were analyzed using the Epi Info version 3.5.1 and Bioestat version 5.0 statistical software. Results: It was found that malaria was not homogeneously distributed in all municipalities. The area of highest priority comprised municipalities located in microregions in the west of the state, at the border of Pará, which also had the highest number of autochthonous cases. The association between the autochthonous and imported cases and the Plasmodium species showed a statistically significant difference (G = 54.25; p < 0.0001). Among the eight microregions, Miracema do Tocantins, Araguaína and Bico do Papagaio accounted for 75.8% of the cases and, among these, eleven municipalities stood out. Regarding provenance, the State of Pará showed widespread distribution with 85.5% of the total, followed by French Guiana with 7.4%. Conclusions: These results demonstrated the predominance of imported cases and the difference between municipalities and microregions, and showed the influence of neighboring states in determining the areas of greatest risk. These data are important, since they contribute towards guiding and directing public policies regarding this disease in Tocantins.
Plasmodium falciparum causes the most severe clinical form of malaria. In this study, we report a severe case of malaria, through following up the patient and from notes in the medical files at the Palmas General Hospital. We discuss the outcome of this case and the complications caused by this infection, recognizing the potential risk of occurrences of severe malaria in not-endemic areas because of the delay in treatment, and the importance of intensifying surveillance measures involving all health unit employees, with emphasis on the reception areas for migrants from endemic regions.
SUMMARYThis study describes the epidemiological profile of malaria in the State of Tocantins, in the period [2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008], investigates the association between the frequency of malaria and population growth, classifies the cases by 'autochthonous' and 'imported', reports the indices of the disease and analyses the distribution of the cases by Plasmodium species, age and gender. The retrospective study was based on secondary data, stored in SIVEP-malaria and analyzed using the software Epi-Info 3.5.1. and Bioestat 5.0. 19,004 samples were investigated for malaria, 19% of them were positive, 73.32% with Plasmodium vivax, 21.80% with Plasmodium falciparum, 4.79% with mixed infections and only 0.08% with Plasmodium malariae. Male individuals accounted for 76.95% and predominated in all years and age groups, especially in the 15 to 49 years old group. From the overall cases, 34.27% were autochthonous and 65.73% were imported (χ 2 = 356.8, p = 0.0001). The frequency of malaria decreased significantly during the entire series (rp = 0.96, p = 0.002) and the number of municipalities with autochthonous transmission also diminished. It was found that malaria is predominantly imported, related to land activities, which confirms the need for effective measures to maintain vigilance throughout the state and enhance educational activities in order to guide the population towards early treatment-seeking.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.