In this paper we introduce a new technique for proving streaming lower bounds (and one-way communication lower bounds), by reductions from a problem called the Boolean Hidden Hypermatching problem (BHH). BHH is a generalization of the well-known Boolean Hidden Matching problem, which was used by Gavinsky et al. to prove an exponential separation between quantum communication complexity and one-way randomized communication complexity. We are the first to introduce BHH, and to prove a lower bound for it.The hardness of the BHH problem is inherently oneway: it is easy to solve BHH using logarithmic two-way communication, but it requires √ n communication if Alice is only allowed to send messages to Bob, and not vice-versa. This one-wayness allows us to prove lower bounds, via reductions, for streaming problems and related communication problems whose hardness is also inherently one-way.By designing reductions from BHH, we prove lower bounds for the streaming complexity of approximating the sorting by reversal distance, of approximately counting the number of cycles in a 2-regular graph, and of other problems.For example, here is one lower bound that we prove, for a cycle-counting problem: Alice gets a perfect matching EA on a set of n nodes, and Bob gets a perfect matching EB on the same set of nodes. The union EA ∪ EB is a collection of cycles, and the goal is to approximate the number of cycles in this collection. We prove that if Alice is allowed to send o( √ n) bits to Bob (and Bob is not allowed to send anything to Alice), then the number of cycles cannot be approximated to within a factor of 1.999, even using a randomized protocol. We prove that it is not even possible to distinguish the case where all cycles are of length 4, from the case where all cycles are of length 8. This lower bound is "natively" one-way: With 4 rounds of communication, it is easy to distinguish these two cases.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

In this paper we prove lower bounds on randomized multiparty communication complexity, both in the blackboard model (where each message is written on a blackboard for all players to see) and (mainly) in the message-passing model, where messages are sent player-to-player. We introduce a new technique for proving such bounds, called symmetrization, which is natural, intuitive, and often easy to use.For example, for the problem where each of k players gets a bit-vector of length n, and the goal is to compute the coordinate-wise XOR of these vectors, we prove a tight lower bounds of Ω(nk) in the blackboard model. For the same problem with AND instead of XOR, we prove a lower bounds of roughly Ω(nk) in the message-passing model (assuming k ≤ n/3200) and Ω(n log k) in the blackboard model. We also prove lower bounds for bit-wise majority, for a graph-connectivity problem, and for other problems; the technique seems applicable to a wide range of other problems as well. All of our lower bounds allow randomized communication protocols with two-sided error.We also use the symmetrization technique to prove several direct-sum-like results for multiparty communication.