A double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) as a rapid, economical alternative to culture isolation procedures for detection of Salmonella. Four MAbs previously shown to react with Salmonella strains representing 18 different serogroups were evaluated as capture antibodies and, after biotinylation, as detection antibodies. One MAb (M183) was selected for use in the ELISA to capture and detect Salmonella antigens. The detection limit of the ELISA was evaluated using Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium and various selective and nonselective Salmonella enrichment media. The highest detection limit (ca. 10(4) CFU/ml) was achieved using an enrichment broth containing brain heart infusion, yeast extract, sodium hydrogen selenite, and sodium cholate (BYSC) after preenrichment in buffered peptone water. The ELISA detected all Salmonella serovars tested, which included representative serovars of serogroups B, C, D, and E and gave negative results for all non-Salmonella species tested. Samples (106) from various sources, including fecal samples from humans and pigeons, chicken carcass rinses, chicken parts, feed, and the environment, were used to evaluate the performance of the ELISA. The ELISA had a specificity and sensitivity of 100 and 91%, respectively, and a kappa value of 0.93 relative to the culture methods. Such an ELISA has the potential to be used in the implementation of the pathogen reduction and hazard analysis critical control point systems as well as in clinical laboratories.
Culture procedures for isolation of thermophilic campylobacters from food matrices are complex, labor intensive, and time-consuming. Most available methods include the use of antibiotics as selective agents to prevent the growth of competing microflora. A simple procedure for isolation of thermophilic campylobacters after enrichment in Rosef's enrichment broth was developed using a hydrophobic grid membrane filter (HGMF) on semisolid medium (SSM). SSM contains no antibiotics, and the HGMF physically separates Campylobacter from the enrichment broth, allowing isolation based on differential motility. The HGMF-SSM method was compared to the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Food Safety Procedures Manual (FSPM-10) method (Isolation of Thermophilic Campylobacters from Fresh Pork, Beef Veal, Poultry and Ready-to-Eat Meat Products), which includes the use of selective antibiotics. During the initial study, after enrichment the HGMF-SSM method yielded pure cultures of campylobacters after 16 to 18 h (overnight) compared with 48 h for the FSPM-10 method. Ninety-four turkey samples collected at local retail stores and 38 frozen pig fecal samples were processed by both methods. Thirty-five samples (26.5%) were positive by the HGMF-SSM method; 24 (18.2%) of these positive samples contained Campylobacter jejuni and 11 (8.3%) contained Campylobacter coli. With the FSPM-10 method, 25 samples (18.9%) were positive: 21 (15.9%) with C. jejuni and 4 (3%) with C. coli. For a subsequent field study, only the HGMF-SSM method was used to isolate Campylobacter from 1,200 chicken samples and 454 turkey samples sold at retail. Analysis of five subisolates from various samples indicated that only one type of Campylobacter was recovered by the HGMF-SSM method, as ascertained by MICs for 10 antimicrobials, sequencing of the short variable region of the flaA gene, and fingerprinting based on amplified fragment length polymorphism. The absence of antibiotics in the SSM may explain the higher recovery of thermophilic campylobacters. The HGMF-SSM method resulted in improved isolation of campylobacters and is simpler, faster, cheaper, and less labor intensive than the FSPM-10 method. The recovery of one type of Campylobacter from the chicken samples may have important implications, particularly in epidemiological studies.
A bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay (BEIA), using Salmonella-specific monoclonal antibody M183 for capture and biotinylated monoclonal antibody M183 for detection, was developed with InteLite AB streptavidin-biotinylated firefly luciferase complex as a reporter. Salmonella cultures were preenriched in buffered peptone water with shaking for 6 h at 37 degrees C and then selectively enriched in Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate (MKTT) broth and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) medium for 16 h at 42 degrees C. After enrichment, the total test time for the BEIA was 1.5 h. The analytical sensitivity of the BEIA ranged from 6.0 x 10(2) CFU/ml to 1.2 x 10(5) CFU/ml in MKTT and from 1.4 x 10(5) to 2.3 x 10(6) CFU/ml in MSRV using six Salmonella serovars prevalent in Canada. With enrichment cultures, the BEIA detected 1 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis in 25 ml of chicken rinses. Representative strains of 10 Salmonella serovars were detected, and cross-reactivity was not observed with 25 non-Salmonella foodborne bacteria. The BEIA performance was assessed by testing 420 poultry samples, which were analyzed in parallel with the standard MSRV culture method. The BEIA detected 117 (27.88%) Salmonella-positive samples, whereas the standard MSRV culture method detected 124 (29.5%). The BEIA had a sensitivity of 64.5% and a specificity of 87.5% compared to the standard MSRV culture method. However, similar specificities and sensitivities were obtained when the standard MSRV culture method was compared to the BEIA (sensitivity = 68.4% and specificity = 85.5%). Neither method detected 100% of the Salmonella found in the samples tested, and statistical analyses indicated no significant difference between the two methods. In summary, the BEIA offers another alternative for the detection of Salmonella, with the additional advantage of providing a 24-h test for detecting Salmonella in chicken carcass rinses. The results obtained in this research indicate that tests are still needed for the isolation and detection of Salmonella that will establish the true prevalence of Salmonella in chicken samples.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.