Aims
The article examines nurses’ experiences to institutionally enforced choices they must make regarding what patient care will be left undone. Cognitive dissonance theory is used to discuss how missed care is reconciled with the nurses’ sense of professionalism and feelings of compassion.
Background
Research into missed nursing care and care rationing is increasing, with an awareness that it impacts on nurses’ coping ability.
Methods
In‐depth video and telephone interviews were conducted with four experienced nurses who were asked to describe how they made choices regarding required patient care and how they managed care under workload pressures.
Results
Thematic analysis of interview narratives revealed four key themes describing the experiences of nurses managing their work: compromising care; incongruity between professional standards and organisational resources; emotional exhaustion; and depersonalization.
Conclusions
Nurses expressed concerns that their professional values regarding patient care are being lost in a quest to achieve financial targets. It raises questions regarding ethical and psychological dilemmas created for workers by work intensification.
Implications for Nursing Management
Financial effectiveness negatively impacts on nurses’ emotional and clinical well‐being cannot be easily dismissed, given that cognitive dissonance arises from attempting to provide quality care of patients whilst meeting organisational financial targets.
This paper describes the decision-making processes of nurses to take leave or not. These discoveries were unanticipated and gained during the analysis of data from a larger New Zealand study examining the decision-making process around what care to ration on a shift by nurses. What these findings revealed was that nurses seek a balance that places work as first priority, followed by family and then lastly themselves. The analysis highlights work intensification
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.