Ovarian cancer is known as a serious malignancy that affects women’s reproductive tract and can considerably threat their health. A wide range of molecular mechanisms and genetic modifications have been involved in ovarian cancer pathogenesis making it difficult to develop effective therapeutic platforms. Hence, discovery and developing new therapeutic approaches are required. Medicinal plants, as a new source of drugs, could potentially be used alone or in combination with other medicines in the treatment of various cancers such as ovarian cancer. Among various natural compounds, quercetin has shown great anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties. In vitro and in vivo experiments have revealed that quercetin possesses a cytotoxic impact on ovarian cancer cells. Despite obtaining good results both in vitro and in vivo, few clinical studies have assessed the anti-cancer effects of quercetin particularly in the ovarian cancer. Therefore, it seems that further clinical studies may introduce quercetin as therapeutic agent alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs to the clinical setting. Here, we not only summarize the anti-cancer effects of quercetin but also highlight the therapeutic effects of quercetin in the ovarian cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is known as the third most common and fourth leading cancer associated death worldwide. The occurrence of metastasis has remained as a critical challenge in CRC, so that distant metastasis (mostly to the liver) has been manifested in about 20%-25% of patients. Several screening approaches have introduced for detecting CRC in different stages particularly in early stages. The standard treatments for CRC are surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, in alone or combination. Immunotherapy is a set of novel approaches with the aim of remodeling the immune system battle with metastatic cancer cells, such as immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies (immune checkpoint inhibitors), adoptive cell transfer (ACT) and cancer vaccine. Cancer vaccines are designed to trigger the intense response of immune system to tumor-specific antigens. In two last decades, introduction of new cancer vaccines and designing several clinical trials with vaccine therapy, have been taken into consideration in colon cancer patients. This review will describe the treatment approaches with the special attention to vaccines applied to treat colorectal cancer. K E Y W O R D S colorectal cancer, exosome, therapy, vaccine J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:8815-8828.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jcb

The discovery of stem cells and their potential abilities in self‐renewal and differentiation has opened a new horizon in medicine. Scientists have found a small population of stem cells in some types of cancers with the same functions as normal stem cells. There are two models for tumor progression: clonal (stochastic) and cancer stem cell (CSCs) models. According to the first model, all transformed cells in the tumor have carcinogenic potential and are able to proliferate and produce the same cells. The latter model, which has received more attention recently, considers the role of CSCs in drug resistance and tumor metastasis. Following the model, researchers have found that targeting CSCs may be a promising way in cancer therapy. This review describes CSC characteristics in general, while also focusing on CSC properties in the context of pancreatic cancer.

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to present the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 24 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin (MCC) and their response to various therapeutic modalities. Methods: The tumor registry of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group was used to identify patients with MCC diagnosed between 1986 and 2006. Results: The most frequent primary sites were the extremities (50%), followed by the head (33%) and the trunk (17%). Median time of follow-up was 24 months. Sixteen patients were initially diagnosed with stage I, 5 patients with stage II, and 3 patients with stage III (metastatic) disease. Six patients with stage I disease received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and/or radiotherapy (RT). All patients with stage I disease treated only with surgery relapsed, whereas 33% of the patients treated with adjuvant therapy recurred. All patients with stage II disease received adjuvant treatment. Among them, 2 patients relapsed. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with stage I and II disease (stage I: 4-year DFS 27%, 4-year OS 56%; stage II: 4-year DFS 60%, 4-year OS 80%). Patients treated with adjuvant therapy had significantly better DFS than those treated only with surgery (p = 0.012), but OS did not differ significantly (adjuvant group: 4-year DFS 59%, 4-year OS 74%; surgery group: 4-year DFS 10%, 4-year OS 50%). Eleven patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease received CT. The response rate was 73% (complete remission 18%), median progression-free survival was 10 months and median OS was 14 months. Complete remission was achieved in 2 other cases, with the addition of RT after CT. Conclusions: MCC is an aggressive neoplasm with significant chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity, but poor outcome. The role of adjuvant treatment should be further investigated.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the important malignancies that result in cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Multiple lines of evidence have indicated that different responses to therapy in CRC cells led to the failure of the current therapies. Hence, identification of the underlying cellular and molecular pathways involved in the emergence of different responses from CRC cells could contribute to finding and designing new therapeutic platforms to overcome the present limitations. Among the various targets involved in CRC pathogenesis, microRNAs (miRNAs) have key roles in many signaling pathways that are associated with the initiation and progression of CRC. Increasing evidence has confirmed that miRNAs as epigenetic regulators could play critical roles in the response (resistance or sensitivity) to therapy. Cancer stem cells are well‐known players in resistance to therapy in CRC. They have been shown to play significant roles via inhibition and activation of many miRNA networks. Hence, miRNAs could be involved in the resistance and sensitivity of therapy in CRC cells via affecting different mechanisms, such as activation of cancer stem cells. Here, we summarized the role of various miRNAs in response to therapy of CRC cells. Moreover, we highlighted the roles of these molecules in the function of cancer stem cells, which are known as important players in the resistance to therapy in CRC.