The objective of this multicentre study was to undertake a systematic comparison of face-to-face consultations and teleconsultations performed using low-cost videoconferencing equipment. One hundred and twenty-six patients were enrolled by their general practitioners across three sites. Each patient underwent a teleconsultation with a distant dermatologist followed by a traditional face-to-face consultation with a dermatologist. The main outcome measures were diagnostic concordance rates, management plans and patient and doctor satisfaction. One hundred and fifty-five diagnoses were identified by the face-to-face consultations from the sample of 126 patients. Identical diagnoses were recorded from both types of consultation in 59% of cases. Teledermatology consultations missed a secondary diagnosis in 6% of cases and were unable to make a useful diagnosis in 11% of cases. Wrong diagnoses were made by the teledermatologist in 4% of cases. Dermatologists were able to make a definitive diagnosis by face-to-face consultations in significantly more cases than by teleconsultations (P = 0.001). Where both types of consultation resulted in a single diagnosis there was a high level of agreement (kappa = 0.96, lower 95% confidence limit 0.91-1.00). Overall follow-up rates from both types of consultation were almost identical. Fifty per cent of patients seen could have been managed using a single videoconferenced teleconsultation without any requirement for further specialist intervention. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the teleconsultations. General practitioners reported that 75% of the teleconsultations were of educational benefit. This study illustrates the potential of telemedicine to diagnose and manage dermatology cases referred from primary care. Once the problem of image quality has been addressed, further studies will be required to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a teledermatology service and the potential consequences for the provision of dermatological services in the U.K.

Striae distensae (striae: stretch marks) are a common disfiguring condition associated with continuous and progressive stretching of the skin--as occurs during pregnancy. The pathogenesis of striae is unknown but probably relates to changes in those structures that provide skin with its tensile strength and elasticity. Such structures are components of the extracellular matrix, including fibrillin, elastin and collagens. Using a variety of histological techniques, we assessed the distribution of these extracellular matrix components in skin affected by striae. Pregnant women were assessed for the presence of striae, and punch biopsies were obtained from lesional striae and adjacent normal skin. Biopsies were processed for electron microscopy, light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. For histological examination, 7 microns frozen sections were stained so as to identify the elastic fibre network and glycosaminoglycans. Biopsies were also examined with a panel of polyclonal antibodies against collagens I and III, and fibrillin and elastin. Ultrastructural analysis revealed alterations in the appearance of skin affected by striae compared with that of normal skin in that the dermal matrix of striae was looser and more floccular. Light microscopy revealed an increase in glycosaminoglycan content in striae. Furthermore, the number of vertical fibrillin fibres subjacent to the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) and elastin fibres in the papillary dermis was significantly reduced in striae compared with normal skin. The orientation of elastin and fibrillin fibres in the deep dermis showed realignment in that the fibres ran parallel to the DEJ. However, no significant alterations were observed in any other extracellular matrix components. This study identifies a reorganization and diminution of the elastic fibre network of skin affected by striae. Continuous strain on the dermal extracellular matrix, as occurs during pregnancy, may remodel the elastic fibre network in susceptible individuals and manifest clinically as striae distensae.