BackgroundThe purpose of our present work was to compare robotic-assisted UKA and conventional UKA regarding the clinical and radiographic results at 5-year follow-up.MethodsForty-one medial UKAs were conducted with robotic assistance (group ROA) between January 2010 and January 2015, and these subjects were matched with 44 subjects undergoing medial UKAs using the same prosthesis, implanted by conventional technique (group CON). In a 5-year follow-up, subjects were clinically evaluated by using Knee Society functional (KSF), Knee Society clinical (KSC), and Knee Society pain (KSP) scores. Radiographic assessments with regards to coronal mechanical axis (CMA) and condylar twist angle (CTA) were compared between group ROA and group CON.ResultsIn the evaluation, the mechanical limb alignment was significantly increased after operation in each group. The implantation accuracy of the coronal mechanical axis was similar in both groups. As for the evaluation of femoral rotation, the internal rotation in group ROA was remarkably less than that in group CON. The difference was not significant in KSP, KSF, KSC scores between group ROA and group CON.ConclusionOur results showed that robotic assistance improves component position without gaining superior CMA or increasing clinical results versus conventional UKA at 5-year follow-up. To conclude, using robotic assistance in UKA is recommended as compared to conventional UKA. Long-term follow-up will be needed to draw conclusion about the overall outcomes of robotic assistance as compared with conventional technique.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ChiCTR2000033918. Registered 16 June 2020.
Background To report the clinical outcomes of a longitudinal patellar tunnel technique in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament(MPFL) with anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation.Methods From May 2010 to January 2019, we performed MPFL reconstruction with anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft by using a longitudinal patellar tunnel technique on 48 knees in 45 patients(26 female, 19 male) with the median age was 24 (17 ~ 44) years old with recurrent patellar dislocation. We made one 4. 5 mm channel from the medial upper edge of the patella to the surface (medial half) of the patella so that to introduce autograft into the medial femoral channel. The autograft was fixed with absorbable screws with the knee bent at 30°. CT and X-rays were used to assess the correction of the tibia tuberosity- trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patellar tilt angle, Caton-Deschamps index, femoral anteversion angle, tibial extorsion angle, and the presence or absence of knee valgus. Subjective scores, such as Kujala score and Lysholm score, were used to evaluate knee function preoperatively and postoperatively.Results No recurrence of patellar dislocation occurred in these patients during an average of 25 ± 7.6 months (range, 6 to 54 months) of follow-up. Preoperative TT-TG distance, patellar tilt angles, and Caton-Deschamps index was (18.9 ± 5.7)mm(10.2mm ~ 32.4 mm),31.5°±13.7° (20.3°~58.4°),1.1 ± 0.2 (1.0 ~ 1.5), respectively, which were corrected by (10.8 ± 4.3) mm (4.5 mm ~ 17.1 mm), 10.7°±2.6° (5.6°~15.3°), and 1.07 ± 0.06 (1.02 ~ 1.15) postoperatively(P < 0.05). 28 knees were treated with lateral release + MPFL reconstruction; 11 knees were treated with lateral release + tibial tubercle ingression + MPFL reconstruction; 9 knees were treated with lateral release + tibial tubercle ingression and depression + MPFL reconstruction. At the last follow-up, Lysholm score was (89.7 ± 2.3), which significantly improved (P < 0.05) compared with the pre-operational score of (54.4 ± 5.9); Kujala score was (91.5 ± 4.4) points, which significantly improved (P < 0.05) compared with the pre-operational score of (60.6 ± 5.8).Conclusion One patellar tunnels in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) with anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft is a safe, effective, and economic method for recurrent patellar dislocation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.