This study demonstrates that pretreatment with a potent and selective LTD4 antagonist markedly attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, and it suggests that LTD4 is a major mediator of this type of bronchoconstriction.

The sulfidopeptide leukotrienes LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 can cause airway smooth muscle contraction and have been implicated in the pathophysiology of asthma. MK-571 is a selective, potent LTD4 receptor antagonist that could attenuate airway obstruction in asthma by inhibiting the actions of sulfidopeptides at the LTD4 receptor site. The objectives of this study were to investigate the potential for MK-571 to cause bronchodilation in asthma patients with existing airway obstruction and to evaluate its effect on the bronchodilation response to an inhaled beta 2-agonist (albuterol). Twelve male patients (ages 19 to 42 yr) with asthma (baseline FEV1 50 to 80% predicted) participated in this placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period, cross-over study. On separate treatment days, each patient received either MK-571 or placebo intravenously for 6 h; inhaled albuterol was administered at the fifth and sixth hour of MK-571/placebo treatment to achieve maximal bronchodilation on that study day. Spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1) was monitored at intervals throughout each study period. MK-571 caused clinically significant bronchodilation; the increase in FEV1 above baseline, 20 min after the start of the MK-571 infusion, was 22 +/- 3.9% compared with 1.3 +/- 2.3% for placebo (mean +/- SE, p < 0.01). This degree of bronchodilation was maintained throughout the MK-571 infusion. In addition, bronchodilation from inhaled albuterol appeared additive with MK-571. Finally, baseline airway obstruction correlated with the degree of bronchodilation achieved with MK-571 (r = -0.73; p = 0.007).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

acetate is a novel, potent, and specific LTD4-receptor antagonist. The safety, tolerability and plasma drug profiles of single oral doses of MK-0476 (capsules) were evaluated in 18 healthy male volunteers assigned to one of the two parallel 9-subject panels. Under fasting conditions, increasing single doses of 20 to 800 mg were administered in a first part of the study and in a second part, 200 mg MK-0476 was given either as a solution, under fasting conditions, or as capsules, after a standard breakfast. All volunteers completed the study. Side effects, reported by the investigator to be related to study drug, were mild and transient. No laboratory abnormalities were noted. In the evaluated dose range of MK-0476 (20 to 800 mg) the median value of tmax ranged from 2 to 4 h, while the apparent ti,2 value averaged 4 to 5 h. The median tmax value of the 200 mg capsule dose was not significantly different from the median tmax of the 200 mg oral solution dose indicating that neither disintegration nor dissolution is a rate-limiting step for the absorption of MK-0476 from capsules. There was a statistically significant increase in the AUC (geometric mean ratio of fed/fast was 2.52 with 95% confidence interval of 1.25, 5.06) and in Cmax (geometric mean ratio of fed/fast was 1.36 with 95% confidence interval of 0.60, 3.04) when MK-0476 was given together with a breakfast, suggesting an increase in bioavailability. We conclude that single oral doses of MK-0476 (range 20 to 800 mg) appear to be well tolerated and both formulations (capsule and solution) achieve similar plasma concentrations.

No abstract