Study Design: A retrospective cohort. Objective: The objective of this study to determine the correlation between Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from the C4 vertebral body and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-score. Summary of Background Data: Recent attention has turned to the utilization of HU measurements from computed tomography (CT) as a potential screening method for low bone mineral density (BMD). We hypothesized that cervical spine CT HU measurements will correlate with BMD measurements conducted with DXA scans of the femoral neck. Material and Methods: Patients with cervical CT and femoral neck DXA scans at 1 institution were included in the study. HUs were manually measured from the cancellous bone in the C4 vertebrae by 1 author blinded to DXA scans. HU measurements were compared with femoral neck DXA T-scores for the entire population. Results: A total of 149 patients with 149 cervical CT and femoral neck DXA scans were included in the study. The low BMD group (osteoporotic and osteopenic combined) showed a significant difference in HU compared with the normal groups within the study (P<0.0001). A low BMD screening value of 447 HU captured over 95% of patients with low BMD within our study and provided a sensitivity of 92% and negative predictive value of 82.1%. The male and female intrasex analysis demonstrated a significant difference between the low BMD and normal BMD groups with P=0.001 and P=0.0001, respectively. Conclusions: HU measurements taken from the C4 vertebral body on CT scan correlate with low BMD of the femoral neck as determined by DXA scan T-scores. Screening values of 447 HU captured 95% of patients with low BMD, with a high degree of sensitivity, and negative predictive value of 80%. Utilization of cervical spine HU as a screening method provides a simple, quick, and easily assessable screening tool for assessing low BMD. Level of Evidence: Level III—diagnostic.

Background: Biceps tenodesis is a procedure that can address biceps and labral pathology. While there is an increased risk of humeral fracture after biceps tenodesis, it has been described only in case reports. Purpose: To identify the incidence, demographics, and characteristics of humeral shaft fractures after biceps tenodesis. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The US Military Health System Data Repository was searched for patients with a Current Procedural Terminology code for biceps tenodesis between January 2013 and December 2016. The cohort of identified patients was then searched for those assigned a code for humeral fracture per the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision and 10th Revision. The electronic health records and radiographs of patients who were diagnosed with a humeral fracture were then evaluated to confirm that the fracture was related to the biceps tenodesis. Records were then reviewed for patient demographics, radiographs, operative reports, and clinical notes. Results: A total of 15,085 biceps tenodeses were performed between January 2013 and December 2016. There were 11 postoperative and 1 intraoperative humeral fractures. The incidence of fracture was <0.1%. All fractures were extra-articular spiral fractures that propagated through the tenodesis site. Eight patients were treated with functional bracing, 3 with open reduction and internal fixation, and 1 with a soft tissue biceps tenodesis revision. Of 8 patients successfully treated nonoperatively, 6 regained full range of shoulder motion. Only 2 of the 4 patients who required operative treatment regained full range of shoulder motion. Conclusion: Humeral shaft fracture after biceps tenodesis is a rare complication that occurs in 7.9 out of 10,000 cases. Fractures occurred after various methods of fixation, including suture anchor, cortical button, and interference screw. Most patients were initially treated nonoperatively, and those who healed usually achieved full range of motion; however, those who required operative intervention often had restricted range of motion on final follow-up. Future studies should determine risk factors for fracture after biceps tenodesis.

No abstract

Objectives: To correlate femoral neck Hounsfield units (HUs) measured on a computed tomography (CT) scan to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-scores allowing evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) over time after lower extremity traumarelated amputation.