Background Secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Cases of SSC have been reported following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), COVID-SSC. Aims Aim of this study was to compare COVID-SSC to SSC in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) and to assess factors influencing transplant-free survival. Methods In this retrospective, multicenter study involving 127 patients with SSC from 9 tertiary care centers in Germany, COVID-SSC was compared to SSC-CIP and logistic regression analyses were performed investigating factors impacting transplant-free survival. Results 24 patients had COVID-SSC, 77 patients SSC-CIP and 26 patients had other forms of SSC. COVID-SSC developed after a median of 91 days following COVID-19 diagnosis. All patients had received extensive intensive care treatment (median days of mechanical ventilation 48). Patients with COVID-SSC and SSC-CIP were comparable in most of the clinical parameters and transplant-free survival was not different from other forms of SSC (P = 0.443 in log-rank test). In the overall cohort, the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, OR 0.36, 95%-CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.013; P < 0.001 in log-rank test) and high serum albumin levels (OR 0.40, 95%-CI 0.17-0.96, P = 0.040) were independently associated with an increased transplant-free survival, while the presence of liver cirrhosis (OR 2.52, 95%-CI 1.01-6.25, P = 0.047) was associated with worse outcome. MDRO colonization or infection did not impact patients’ survival. Conclusions COVID-SSC and CIP-SSC share the same clinical phenotype, course of the disease and risk factors for its development. UDCA may be a promising therapeutic option in SSC, though future prospective trials need to confirm our findings.
e16668 Background: The multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib has been approved by the European Medicines Agency in November 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior treated with sorafenib. We report, to our knowledge, for the first time safety and efficacy data of an international, multicenter, real-world cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with cabozantinib. Methods: Patients with HCC who were treated with cabozantinib were retrospectively identified across 10 centers in Austria and Germany. Patients´ characteristics, side effects, duration of treatment and survival data were analyzed until January 17, 2020. Results: 74 patients were identified of whom 65 patients were male (88%) and 9 were female (12%). The median age at the start of cabozantinib treatment was 66 years. The most common underlying liver diseases included hepatitis C in 15 (20%), hepatitis B in 6 (8%), alcohol in 17 (23%) and NAFLD/NASH in 20 (27%) patients, respectively. 64 patients (86%) had BCLC stage C and 43 patients (58%) were Child Pugh A. Cabozantinib was used as systemic second- and third-line treatment in 37 (50%), and 25 (34%) patients, respectively. In the remaining patients cabozantinib was used in further lines. The median starting dose was 40 mg (20-60 mg). In 26 patients (35%) a dose reduction due to side effects was performed. Following best responses under cabozantinib were documented: partial response in 4 (5%), stable disease in 22 (30%), and progressive disease in 24 (32%) patients, respectively. 24 patients (32%) had not yet been evaluable. The median duration of cabozantinib treatment was 4.4 months. 35 patients (47%) had died at day of data analysis. The median overall survival from start of cabozantinib treatment was 7.7 months. Most common adverse events were fatigue and diarrhea. Conclusions: Cabozantinib treatment was effective, safe and feasible in patients with advanced HCC. Patients in the real life setting had more advanced liver disease – only 58% of patients were Child A. Duration of treatment was similar to the phase 3 trial (CELESTIAL). However, overall survival was shorter, probably due to more advanced liver disease.
Background Patients with cirrhosis and ascites (and portal hypertension) are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). Although many etiologies exist, hepatorenal AKI (HRS-AKI) remains a frequent and difficult-to-treat cause, with a very high mortality when left untreated. The standard of care is the use of terlipressin and albumin. This can lead to reversal of AKI, which is associated to survival. Nevertheless, only approximately half of the patients achieve this reversal and even after reversal patients remains at risk for new episodes of HRS-AKI. TIPS is accepted for use in patients with variceal bleeding and refractory ascites, which leads to a reduction in portal pressure. Although preliminary data suggest it may be useful in HRS-AKI, its use in this setting is controversial and caution is recommended given the fact that HRS-AKI is associated to cardiac alterations and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) which represent relative contraindications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). In the last decades, with the new definition of renal failure in patients with cirrhosis, patients are identified at an earlier stage. These patients are less sick and therefore more likely to not have contraindications for TIPS. We hypothesize that TIPS could be superior to the standard of care in patients with HRS-AKI. Methods This study is a prospective, multicenter, open, 1:1-randomized, controlled parallel-group trial. The main end-point is to compare the 12-month liver transplant-free survival in patients assigned to TIPS compared to the standard of care (terlipressin and albumin). Secondary end-point include reversal of HRS-AKI, health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL), and incidence of further decompensation among others. Once patients are diagnosed with HRS-AKI, they will be randomized to TIPS or Standard of Care (SOC). TIPS should be placed within 72 h. Until TIPS placement, TIPS patients will be treated with terlipressin and albumin. Once TIPS is placed, terlipressin and albumin should be weaned off according to the attending physician. Discussion If the trial were to show a survival advantage for patients who undergo TIPS placement, this could be incorporated in routine clinical practice in the management of patients with HRS-AKI. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05346393. Released to the public on 01 April 2022.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.