Free-radical copolymerizations of styrene and phthalimido-2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (PHPMA) were carried out at 60°C in a 1,4-dioxane solution in the presence of 2,2Ј-azobisisobutyronitrile at low conversions (Ͻ15%). The copolymer compositions were established by elemental analysis. The monomer reactivity ratios r 1 (PHPMA) and r 2 (styrene) were determined with the linearized copolymerization equations of the Kelen-Tü dös and inverted Fineman-Ross methods and with the nonlinear relationship of the Mayo-Lewis method to be r 1 ϭ 1.41 and r 2 ϭ 0.24, r 1 ϭ 1.52 and r 2 ϭ 0.26, and r 1 ϭ 1.15 and r 2 ϭ 0.16, respectively. The monomer reactivity ratios and glass-transition temperatures of the copolymers as functions of the copolymer composition are discussed.
Background: Growing rods (GRs) is a commonly utilized technique for the management of early-onset scoliosis. The significance of the position of the apical vertebrae relative to the rods is not known. The purpose of this study is to analyze the potential effects of the position of the apical vertebrae in relation to the GRs on deformity control through plain radiographs and finite element analysis (FEA) modeling. Methods: We identified 140 patients treated with GR between 2000 and 2018. Patients who had a congenital vertebral anomaly or <2-year follow-up were excluded. Curve magnitude, traction radiograph under general anesthesia (TRUGA) flexibility, apical rotation, the lengths of T1-12, T1-S1, and the instrumented segments were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the apical position on the postoperative radiographs: group 1 (both pedicles are between the rods), group 2 (convex rod is between the apical vertebra pedicles), group 3 (both pedicles are lateral to the convex rod). FEA models were created simulating the 3 groups. Both radiographic and FEA data were analyzed to compare the deformity control and growth in each group. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the final analyses (mean age 84 mo; range: 38 to 148). Ten patients (17%) were in group 1, 34 (59%) in group 2, and 14 (24%) in group 3. Difference between TRUGA flexibilities was statistically insignificant. Group 3 was the least successful in terms of both height gain and rotational control. FEA showed a decrease in rotation and displacement for every group, however, the residual rotation and displacement was highest in group 3. Conclusions: Bringing the apex in line with the GR increases the capacity of growth preservation as it results in largest height gain and better deformity control. FEA model demonstrated that distraction alone is inadequate for controlling rotation, and with increasing apical translation, residual rotation after distraction also increases. Level of Evidence: Level III.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.