Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP‐2) has been widely used in bone tissue engineering to enhance bone regeneration because of its osteogenic inductivity. However, clinical outcomes can vary depending on the scaffold materials used to deliver rhBMP‐2. In this study, 3D‐printed scaffolds with a ratio of 1:1 polycaprolactone and beta‐tricalcium phosphate (PCL/T50) were applied as carriers for rhBMP‐2 in mandibular bone defect models in dog models. Before in vivo application, in vitro experiments were conducted. Preosteoblast proliferation was not significantly different between scaffolds made of PCL/T50 and polycaprolactone alone (PCL/T0) regardless of rhBMP‐2 delivery. However, PCL/T50 showed an increased level of the alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization assay when rhBMP‐2 was delivered. In in vivo, the newly formed bone volume of the PCL/T50 group was significantly increased compared with that of the PCL/T0 scaffolds regardless of rhBMP‐2 delivery. Histological examination showed that PCL/T50 with rhBMP‐2 produced significantly greater amounts of newly bone formation than PCL/T0 with rhBMP‐2. The quantities of scaffold remaining were lower in the PCL/T50 group than in the PCL/T0 group, although it was not significantly different. In conclusion, PCL/T50 scaffolds were advantageous for rhBMP‐2 delivery as well as for maintaining space for bone formation in mandibular bone defects.

Objectives This 12‐week clinical trial evaluated efficacy and adverse events for two recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) delivery systems in alveolar ridge preservation. Materials and methods Sixty‐four patients had a single tooth that required replacement with an implant, surrounded by > 50% alveolar bone height. Two cohorts (n = 32 patients each) were randomized to receive a rhBMP‐2‐soaked absorbable collagen sponge (test group), or β‐tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite particles (control group) immersed in rhBMP‐2, at the implant site. Bone height and width changes at 25%, 50%, and 75% of extraction socket level (ESL) were compared. Adverse events were assessed in the same period. In addition to the randomized controlled clinical trial, histological analysis of 21 patients (test group [n = 12], control group [n = 9]) was conducted, 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation. A non‐inferiority test was used to analyze changes in alveolar bone height between groups (p = 0.05). A Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used to analyze changes in alveolar bone width and histomorphometric results between groups (p = 0.05). Results All patients showed good healing without severe adverse events. The lower limit of the one‐sided 97.5% confidence interval in the difference between the two groups was 0.0033 (non‐inferiority margin: −0.185); thus, the test group showed non‐inferiority to the control group. Wilcoxon rank‐sum test analysis did not show statistically significant differences between groups with regard to changes in alveolar bone width and histomorphometric analysis. Conclusions The delivery systems showed similar efficacy for alveolar ridge preservation without severe adverse events.

PURPOSE This study was conducted to investigate patterns of adjacent tooth displacement in the posterior implant with interproximal contact loss (ICL) by 3-D digital superimposition method. MATERIALS AND METHODS Posterior partially edentulous patients, restored with implant fixed partial prostheses before 2011 and suffered from food impaction of ICL between 2009 and 2011, were included. Two dental casts, at the time of delivery and at the time of food impaction in a same patient, was converted into 3-D digital models through scanning and superimposition was performed to assess chronologic changes of the dentition. Directions of tooth displacement were evaluated and the amount of ICL was calculated. Correlations between the amount of ICL and elapsed time, or between the amount of ICL and age after function, were assessed at a significance level of P <.05. RESULTS A total number of 13 patients (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 65.76 ± 9.94 years and 17 areas (4 maxillae, 13 mandibles) were included in this retrospective study. Teeth adjacent to the implant restoration showed complex displacements but characteristic tendency according to the location of the arch. The mean amount of ICL was 0.33 ± 0.14 mm. Elapsed time from function to ICL was 61.47 ± 31.27 months. There were no significant differences between the amount of ICL and elapsed time, or age ( P >.05). CONCLUSION Natural teeth showed various directional movements to result in occlusal change in the arch. The 3-D superimposition of chronologic digital models was a helpful method to analyze the changes of dentition and individual tooth displacement adjacent to implant restoration.

Epoxy resin-based sealers are commonly used for successful endodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of epoxy resin-based sealers under unset and set conditions. Three epoxy resin-based sealers were used: Adseal, AH Plus, and Dia-Proseal. To test cytotoxicity, an agar overlay test and a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay were performed using unset and set sealers on L929 mouse fibroblasts. The genotoxicity test of the comet assay was performed using the same cell line. Extract dilutions in the culture media were used as test materials for the MTT and comet assays. The comet tail produced by the damaged DNA was calculated by image analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test. Unset sealers did not show defined decolorized areas. Hardened specimens of resin-based sealers showed circular discolored zones in the agar overlay test. Dia-Proseal was the least cytotoxic after hardening. These results were confirmed in the MTT assay. Cell viability was significantly higher in cells treated with hardened sealers in both groups than that in cells treated with freshly mixed sealers in the MTT assay. Unset AH Plus® and Dia-Proseal™ significantly increased cell viability with decreasing dilution. Adseal™ was the least cytotoxic. Freshly mixed Adseal™ was more genotoxic when freshly mixed than when set. Unset epoxy resin-based sealers were generally more cytotoxic and genotoxic than set materials. Cytotoxicity does not always match the genotoxicity results; therefore, various test tools are required to test toxicity. It is necessary to properly evaluate the toxic effects to establish a biocompatibility test that mimics clinical conditions.

No abstract