Pharmacodynamic biomarkers can play an important role in understanding whether a therapeutic agent has “hit its target” to impact biologic function. A pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy remains to be elucidated. We previously reported that anti-CTLA-4 therapy increases the frequency of CD4 T-cells expressing the inducible costimulator (ICOS) molecule. To determine whether the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T-cells could be used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy, we performed flow cytometric studies and statistical analyses on data from 56 individuals, which included 10 healthy donors, 36 patients who received anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and 10 patients who received treatment with a different immunomodulatory agent (gp100 DNA vaccine). After treatment with anti-CTLA-4 mAb (ipilimumab, Bristol Myers-Squibb), we detected a statistically significant increase in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T-cells. After two doses of anti-CTLA-4 therapy, the assay was found to have an estimated specificity of 96% (95% confidence interval: 88%-100%) and sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 54%-85%), with positive expression defined as a frequency that is greater than the upper bound of 95% confidence interval among baseline samples from all subjects. Our data suggest that an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T-cells measured by flow cytometry can be used as a reproducible pharmacodynamic biomarker to indicate biologic activity in the setting of anti-CTLA-4 therapy, which should enable appropriate immune monitoring to determine whether patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy or combination treatment strategies are having an adequate biologic response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.