This book is a guide to the use of inverse theory for estimation and conditional simulation of flow and transport parameters in porous media. It describes the theory and practice of estimating properties of underground petroleum reservoirs from measurements of flow in wells, and it explains how to characterize the uncertainty in such estimates. Early chapters present the reader with the necessary background in inverse theory, probability and spatial statistics. The book demonstrates how to calculate sensitivity coefficients and the linearized relationship between models and production data. It also shows how to develop iterative methods for generating estimates and conditional realizations. The text is written for researchers and graduates in petroleum engineering and groundwater hydrology and can be used as a textbook for advanced courses on inverse theory in petroleum engineering. It includes many worked examples to demonstrate the methodologies and a selection of exercises.

History matching is a type of inverse problem in which observed reservoir behavior is used to estimate reservoir model variables that caused the behavior. Obtaining even a single history-matched reservoir model requires a substantial amount of effort, but the past decade has seen remarkable progress in the ability to generate reservoir simulation models that match large amounts of production data. Progress can be partially attributed to an increase in computational power, but the widespread adoption of geostatistics and Monte Carlo methods has also contributed indirectly. In this review paper, we will summarize key developments in history matching and then review many of the accomplishments of the past decade, including developments in reparameterization of the model variables, methods for computation of the sensitivity coefficients, and methods for quantifying uncertainty. An attempt has been made to compare representative procedures and to identify possible limitations of each.

No abstract

Summary The dynamical equations for multiphase flow in porous media are highly nonlinear and the number of variables required to characterize the medium is usually large, often two or more variables per simulator gridblock. Neither the extended Kalman filter nor the ensemble Kalman filter is suitable for assimilating data or for characterizing uncertainty for this type of problem. Although the ensemble Kalman filter handles the nonlinear dynamics correctly during the forecast step, it sometimes fails badly in the analysis (or updating) of saturations. This paper focuses on the use of an iterative ensemble Kalman filter for data assimilation in nonlinear problems, especially of the type related to multiphase ow in porous media. Two issues are key:iteration to enforce constraints andensuring that the resulting ensemble is representative of the conditional pdf (i.e., that the uncertainty quantification is correct). The new algorithm is compared to the ensemble Kalman filter on several highly nonlinear example problems, and shown to be superior in the prediction of uncertainty. Introduction For linear problems, the Kalman filter is optimal for assimilating measurements to continuously update the estimate of state variables. Kalman filters have occasionally been applied to the problem of estimating values of petroleum reservoir variables (Eisenmann et al. 1994; Corser et al. 2000), but they are most appropriate when the problems are characterized by a small number of variables and when the variables to be estimated are linearly related to the observations. Most data assimilation problems in petroleum reservoir engineering are highly nonlinear and are characterized by many variables, often two or more variables per simulator gridblock. The problem of weather forecasting is in many respects similar to the problem of predicting future petroleum reservoir performance. The economic impact of inaccurate predictions is substantial in both cases, as is the difficulty of assimilating very large data sets and updating very large numerical models. One method that has been recently developed for assimilating data in weather forecasting is ensemble Kalman filtering (Evensen 1994; Houtekamer and Mitchell 1998; Anderson and Anderson 1999; Hamill et al. 2000; Houtekamer and Mitchell 2001; Evensen 2003). It has been demonstrated to be useful for weather prediction over the North Atlantic. The method is now beginning to be applied for data assimilation in groundwater hydrology (Reichle et al. 2002; Chen and Zhang 2006) and in petroleum engineering (Nævdal et al. 2002, 2005; Gu and Oliver 2005; Liu and Oliver 2005a; Wen and Chen 2006, 2007; Zafari and Reynolds 2007; Gao et al. 2006; Lorentzen et al. 2005; Skjervheim et al. 2007; Dong et al. 2006), but the applications to state variables whose density functions are bimodal has proved problematic (Gu and Oliver 2006). For applications to nonlinear assimilation problems, it is useful to think of the ensemble Kalman filter as a least squares method that obtains an averaged gradient for minimization not from a variational approach but from an empirical correlation between model variables (Anderson 2003; Zafari et al. 2006). In addition to providing a mean estimate of the variables, a Monte Carlo estimate of uncertainty can be obtained directly from the variability in the ensemble.

The study considers an iterative formulation of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for strongly nonlinear systems in the perfect-model framework. In the first part, a scheme is introduced that is similar to the ensemble randomized maximal likelihood (EnRML) filter by Gu and Oliver. The two new elements in the scheme are the use of the ensemble square root filter instead of the traditional (perturbed observations) EnKF and rescaling of the ensemble anomalies with the ensemble transform matrix from the previous iteration instead of estimating sensitivities between the ensemble observations and ensemble anomalies at the start of the assimilation cycle by linear regression. A simple modification turns the scheme into an ensemble formulation of the iterative extended Kalman filter. The two versions of the algorithm are referred to as the iterative EnKF (IEnKF) and the iterative extended Kalman filter (IEKF). In the second part, the performance of the IEnKF and IEKF is tested in five numerical experiments: two with the 3-element Lorenz model and three with the 40-element Lorenz model. Both the IEnKF and IEKF show a considerable advantage over the EnKF in strongly nonlinear systems when the quality or density of observations are sufficient to constrain the model to the regime of mainly linear propagation of the ensemble anomalies as well as constraining the fast-growing modes, with a much smaller advantage otherwise. The IEnKF and IEKF can potentially be used with large-scale models, and can represent a robust and scalable alternative to particle filter (PF) and hybrid PF–EnKF schemes in strongly nonlinear systems.