No abstract

We introduce Multi-Source 3D (MS3D), a new self-training pipeline for unsupervised domain adaptation in 3D object detection. Despite the remarkable accuracy of 3D detectors, they often overfit to specific domain biases, leading to suboptimal performance in various sensor setups and environments. Existing methods typically focus on adapting a single detector to the target domain, overlooking the fact that different detectors possess distinct expertise on different unseen domains. MS3D leverages this by combining different pre-trained detectors from multiple source domains and incorporating temporal information to produce high-quality pseudolabels for fine-tuning. Our proposed Kernel-Density Estimation (KDE) Box Fusion method fuses box proposals from multiple domains to obtain pseudo-labels that surpass the performance of the best source domain detectors. MS3D exhibits greater robustness to domain shifts and produces accurate pseudolabels over greater distances, making it well-suited for highto-low beam domain adaptation and vice versa. Our method achieved state-of-the-art performance on all evaluated datasets, and we demonstrate that the choice of pre-trained source detectors has minimal impact on the self-training result, making MS3D suitable for real-world applications. Our code is available at https://github.com/darrenjkt/MS3D.

We propose a robust calibration pipeline that optimises the selection of calibration samples for the estimation of calibration parameters that fit the entire scene. We minimise user error by automating the data selection process according to a metric, called Variability of Quality (VOQ) that gives a score to each calibration set of samples. We show that this VOQ score is correlated with the estimated calibration parameter's ability to generalise well to the entire scene, thereby overcoming the overfitting problems of existing calibration algorithms. Our approach has the benefits of simplifying the calibration process for practitioners of any calibration expertise level and providing an objective measure of the quality for our calibration pipeline's input and output data. We additionally use a novel method of assessing the accuracy of the calibration parameters. It involves computing reprojection errors for the entire scene to ensure that the parameters are well fitted to all features in the scene. Our proposed calibration pipeline takes 90s, and obtains an average reprojection error of 1-1.2cm, with standard deviation of 0.4-0.5cm over 46 poses evenly distributed in a scene. This process has been validated by experimentation on a high resolution, software definable lidar, Baraja Spectrum-Scan™; and a low, fixed resolution lidar, Velodyne VLP-16. We have shown that despite the vast differences in lidar technologies, our proposed approach manages to estimate robust calibration parameters for both. Our code and data set used for this paper are made available at https://gitlab.acfr.usyd.edu.au/its/ cam_lidar_calibration.