The head and neck district represents one of the most frequent sites of cancer, and the percentage of metastases is very high in both loco-regional and distant areas. Prognosis refers to several factors: a) stage of disease; b) loco-regional relapses; c) distant metastasis. At diagnosis, distant metastases of head and neck cancers are present in about 10% of cases with an additional 20-30% developing metastases during the course of their disease. Diagnosis of distant metastases is associated with unfavorable prognosis, with a median survival of about 10 months. The aim of the present review is to provide an update on distant metastasis in head and neck oncology. Recent achievements in molecular profiling, interaction between neoplastic tissue and the tumor microenvironment, oligometastatic disease concepts, and the role of immunotherapy have all deeply changed the therapeutic approach and disease control. Firstly, we approach topics such as natural history, epidemiology of distant metastases and relevant pathological and radiological aspects. Focus is then placed on the most relevant clinical aspects; particular attention is reserved to tumours with distant metastasis and positive for EBV and HPV, and the oligometastatic P. Pisani et al. S2 concept. A substantial part of the review is dedicated to different therapeutic approaches. We highlight the role of immunotherapy and the potential effects of innovative technologies. Lastly, we present ethical and clinical perspectives related to frailty in oncological patients and emerging difficulties in sustainable socio-economical governance.

BackgroundEnhancing the antitumor activity of the DNA-damaging drugs is an attractive strategy to improve current treatment options. Trabectedin is an isoquinoline alkylating agent with a peculiar mechanism of action. It binds to minor groove of DNA inducing single- and double-strand-breaks. These kinds of damage lead to the activation of PARP1, a first-line enzyme in DNA-damage response pathways. We hypothesized that PARP1 targeting could perpetuate trabectedin-induced DNA damage in tumor cells leading finally to cell death.MethodsWe investigated trabectedin and PARP1 inhibitor synergism in several tumor histotypes both in vitro and in vivo (subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor xenografts in mice). We searched for key determinants of drug synergism by comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and gene expression profiling (GEP) and validated their functional role.ResultsTrabectedin activated PARP1 enzyme and the combination with PARP1 inhibitors potentiated DNA damage, cell cycle arrest at G2/M checkpoint and apoptosis, if compared to single agents. Olaparib was the most active PARP1 inhibitor to combine with trabectedin and we confirmed the antitumor and antimetastatic activity of trabectedin/olaparib combination in mice models. However, we observed different degree of trabectedin/olaparib synergism among different cell lines. Namely, in DMR leiomyosarcoma models the combination was significantly more active than single agents, while in SJSA-1 osteosarcoma models no further advantage was obtained if compared to trabectedin alone. aCGH and GEP revealed that key components of DNA-repair pathways were involved in trabectedin/olaparib synergism. In particular, PARP1 expression dictated the degree of the synergism. Indeed, trabectedin/olaparib synergism was increased after PARP1 overexpression and reduced after PARP1 silencing.ConclusionsPARP1 inhibition potentiated trabectedin activity in a PARP1-dependent manner and PARP1 expression in tumor cells might be a useful predictive biomarker that deserves clinical evaluation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0652-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) involvement contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and represents a major challenge for clinicians. Liquid biopsy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) harbours clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with CNS metastases and could be effective in tracking tumour evolution.MethodsIn a HER2-positive mBC patient with brain metastases, we applied droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis to measure ctDNA dynamic changes in CSF and plasma collected during treatment.ResultsBaseline CSF-derived ctDNA analysis revealed TP53 and PIK3CA mutations as well as ERBB2 and cMYC amplification. Post-treatment ctDNA analysis showed decreased markers level in plasma, consistent with extra-CNS disease control, while increased in the CSF, confirming poor treatment benefit in the CNS.DiscussionAnalysis of ctDNA in the CSF of HER2-positive mBC is feasible and could represent a useful companion for clinical management of brain metastases.

BackgroundWe recently reported that self‐evaluation of the incidence and severity of treatment‐related side effects (TSEs) using a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0‐based questionnaire was feasible and more informative than doctor reports in patients undergoing standard adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Here, we compare self‐ and doctor‐evaluated day of onset and duration of TSEs in the same population.Patients and methodsSix hundred and four patients were enrolled at 11 sites in Italy. CTCAE v4.0 definitions of grade of severity of nausea, vomiting, constipation, anorexia, dysgeusia, diarrhea, fatigue, pain, paresthesia, and dyspnea were translated into Italian and rephrased. Questionnaires were administered after the first and third chemotherapy cycles. At each time‐point, information on TSEs was extracted from the medical charts and compared to patient questionnaires.ResultsA total of 594 and 573 paired patient and doctor questionnaires were collected after cycles one and three, respectively. TSE duration was significantly longer when reported by patients compared to doctors for six and seven of ten items after cycles one and three, respectively. Due to the combined effect of doctor underreporting of TSE incidence and duration, the mean percentages of cycle days with TSEs were significantly higher for all ten items when based on patient reports. Day of onset could not be evaluated because of insufficient numbers of complete records.ConclusionsSelf‐reporting TSE duration is feasible using a CTCAE‐derived questionnaire. As doctors tend to underestimate TSE incidence and duration, patient‐reported outcomes should be incorporated into clinical practice, perhaps using eHealth technologies, to harness their potential to better estimate total TSE burden.