falls risk factor reduction is possible in residents of care homes. A modest reduction in falls rates was demonstrated but this failed to reach statistical significance.

1. The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa administered alone and in the presence of carbidopa was investigated in young and elderly healthy volunteers. 2. The plasma clearance of levodopa following intravenous administration of 50 mg was 14.2 +/‐ 2.8 (s.d.) ml min‐1 kg‐1 in the elderly compared with 23.4 +/‐ 4.1 ml min‐1 kg‐1 in the young (P less than 0.01) which resulted in a 49% greater area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) in the older subjects (P less than 0.01). The volume of distribution (Vss) was lower in the elderly (1.01 +/‐ 0.29 l kg‐1) than in the young (1.65 +/‐ 0.39 l kg‐1) (P less than 0.002). 3. Following oral administration of 250 mg of levodopa the AUC was 2512 +/‐ 588 ng ml‐1h in the elderly compared with 1056 +/‐ 282 ng ml‐1h in the young (P less than 0.002). Cmax was also significantly greater in the elderly (P less than 0.05). The bioavailability of levodopa was significantly greater in the elderly (0.63 +/‐ 0.12 compared with 0.41 +/‐ 0.16, P less than 0.01). 4. In the presence of carbidopa, the plasma clearance of intravenous levodopa (50 mg) was reduced in both age groups but remained lower in the elderly (5.8 +/‐ 0.9 ml min‐1 kg‐1 compared with 9.3 +/‐ 1.0 ml min‐1 kg‐1; P less than 0.01). This resulted in a 54% greater AUC in the older subjects (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1. The pharmacokinetics of levodopa and paracetamol after single oral doses have been investigated in eight healthy young volunteers in the fasted state and following isocaloric meals containing either 10.5 g or 30.5 g of protein. 2. The initial peak and maximum plasma drug concentrations and the times at which these occurred were not affected by food. 3. The mean area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) for paracetamol following an overnight fast did not differ significantly from that observed following the low and high protein meals. 4. By contrast, the AUC for levodopa following the low protein meal (193.9 +/‐ 15.7 micrograms ml‐1 min) was significantly lower compared with administration in the fasted state (216.5 +/‐ 26.1 micrograms ml‐1 min). However, there were no significant differences in the kinetics of levodopa between the fasting state and following the high protein meal. 5. There was no evidence that consumption of a meal containing 30.5 g of protein impaired either the rate or extent of absorption of levodopa. Therefore the reported beneficial effects of a low protein diet in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease probably result from reduced competition for levodopa transport across the blood‐brain barrier.

No abstract