Dynamic light scattering measurements are reported for poly(ethylene-co-20.2 mol % 1-butene) (PEB10) in dimethyl ether (DME) at 110-170°C and pressures to 2500 bar. The cloud-point curve for the PEB10-DME system exhibits both low-and high-pressure upper consolute solution temperature (UCST) branches. The polymer infinite dilution translational diffusion coefficient, D0, increases with increasing temperature and decreasing pressure as expected. The observed variation of D0 is inversely proportional to the solvent viscosity, indicating that the polymer coil hydrodynamic size is independent of temperature and pressure. The dynamic second virial coefficient, kD, which represents a balance between thermodynamic interactions and hydrodynamic forces, displays values that lie within the bounds expected for Θ and good solvent conditions. While the low-pressure UCST is classical in that the polymer-solvent interactions become unfavorable upon approach to this phase boundary, the highpressure UCST branch exhibits anomalous behavior wherein polymer-solvent interactions improve as this phase boundary is approached. Such behavior suggests that the phase separation is entropic in origin and is driven by unfavorable mixing effects.
The title of this letter implies two questions: To what degree is plastic damage inherently predictable at the atomic scale, and can this predictability be quantified? We answer these questions by combining image analysis with molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to quantify similarities between atomic structures of plastic damage in a database of strained copper bi-crystals. We show that a manifold of different outcomes can originate ostensibly from the same initial structure, but that with this approach complex plastic damage within this manifold can be statistically connected to the initial structure. Not only does this work introduce a powerful approach for analyzing MD simulations of a complex plastic damage but also provides a much needed and critical framework for analyzing and organizing atomic-scale microstructural databases.
While molecular dynamics simulations have been used for decades to study structure and formation mechanisms of plastic damage in crystals, the analytical tools needed to characterize collections of plastic defects have been limited. Here we demonstrate the use of two methods, spatial cross-correlations (CC) and Linear Discriminate Analysis (LDA), to analyze and compare plastic damage profiles among molecular dynamics simulations in which damage was created by straining bi-crystals containing symmetric tilt grain boundaries with different tilt angles. Two potentials were used, one representing Cu and one representing Ag, and two coarse-grained descriptors for different types of crystal damage were used, averaged central symmetry parameters (CSP) and atomic hydrostatic stress (HS). We find that in general the CSP is a more accurate descriptor than HS for both analysis methods, and for data base sizes of about 30 or more simulations per tilt angle, the LDA does considerably better in predicting angle and material than the CC method. For example, at the largest data base size of 50 simulations per tilt angle and using the average CSP values, the LDA predicts the exact initial tilt angle and material type for 92% of the simulations, while the CC approach drops to 58%. If the average HS is used instead of the average CSP, the LDA and CC predictions drop to 63% and 32%, respectively. These results point to a number of possible applications of this method, for example in quantifying how the range of damage for a set of strained systems may depend on strain rate or temperature, or quantifying similarities between complex damage from processes such as indentation and energetic ion bombardment.
BACKGROUNDControlled‐release pesticide formulations have emerged as a promising approach towards sustainable pest control. Herein, an environment‐friendly formulation of insecticide chlorantraniliprole (CAP) was fabricated through a simple approach of coprecipitation‐based synchronous encapsulation by chitosan (CTS), with carrier–pesticide interaction mechanism and release behavior investigated.RESULTSThe resulting CAP/CTS controlled‐release formulation (CCF) showed a good loading content of 28.1% and a high encapsulation efficiency of 75.6%. Instrument determination in combination with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations displayed that the primary interactions between CAP and CTS were physical adsorption and complicated hydrogen (H)‐bonds, which formed dominantly between NH in amides [or nitrogen (N) in ring structures] of CAP and hydroxyl (or amino) groups of CTS, as well as oxygen (O) in CAP with hydrogen in CTS or H2O molecules. The in vitro release tests exhibited obvious pH/temperature sensitivity, with release dynamics following the first‐order or Ritger–Peppas model. As the temperature increased, the CAP release process of the Ritger–Peppas model changed from Case‐II to anomalous transport, and ultimately to a Fickian diffusion mechanism. The control effect against Plutella xylostella larvae also was evaluated by toxicity tests, where comparable efficacy of CCF to the commercial suspension concentrate was obtained.CONCLUSIONThe innovative, easy‐to‐prepare CCF can be used as a formulation with obvious pH/temperature sensitivity and good efficacy on target pests. This work contributes to the development of efficient and safe pesticide delivery systems, especially using the natural polymer materials as carriers. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.