A variety of experimental approaches have been used to alter reflex parasympathetic cardiovascular control in normal human subjects and in patients with cardiovascular diseases. This review critically appraises several of these methods (the Valsalva maneuver, upright tilt, lower body negative pressure, pressor drug infusion, neck suction, and coronary arteriography) and summarizes the normal response patterns of healthy subjects and the abnormal response patterns of some patients with cardiovascular disease. Tests of parasympathetic function tend to be heterogeneous; they are not standardized, and, therefore, valid comparisons between results from different studies may be difficult to make. Moreover, although most of these tests are simple to perform, they may provoke surprisingly complex alterations of afferent and efferent autonomic activity. Notwithstanding these methodological difficulties, the research area of human parasympathetic cardiovascular control may have great importance, because parasympathetic reflex mechanisms are involved in diseases of major public health significance for which animal models may be imperfect or nonexistent.
We examined the role of carotid baroreceptors in the short-term modulation of sympathetic outflow to the muscle vascular bed and parasympathetic outflow to the heart in 10 healthy adults. Afferent carotid baroreceptor activity was modified with 30-mmHg neck suction or pressure applied during held expiration, and efferent sympathetic activity was measured with microelectrodes inserted percutaneously into peroneal nerve muscle fascicles. Sympathetic responses were conditioned importantly by directional changes of carotid transmural pressure: increased pressure (onset of neck suction or offset of neck pressure) inhibited (totally) sympathetic activity, and reduced pressure (offset of neck suction or onset of neck pressure) augmented sympathetic activity. Responses occurred after a latency of about 2 s and did not persist as long as changes of neck-chamber pressure. Cardiac intervals were prolonged by increased carotid transmural pressures and shortened by decreased carotid transmural pressures, but, in contrast to sympathetic responses, cardiac responses adapted only slightly during neck-chamber pressure changes. Our results suggest that in the human a common baroreceptor input is processed differently in central vagal and sympathetic networks. Muscle sympathetic responses to changing levels of afferent baroreceptor traffic are profound but transitory. They appear to be conditioned more by changes of arterial pressure than by its absolute levels.
We studied three groups of eight men each--high, mid, and low fit (peak O2 consumption 60.0 +/- 0.8, 48.9 +/- 1.0, and 35.7 +/- 0.9 ml.min-1.kg-1)--to determine the mechanism of orthostatic intolerance in endurance athletes. Tolerance was defined by progressive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) to presyncope. Maximal calf vascular conductance (Gmax) was measured. The carotid baroreflex was characterized using both stepwise R-wave-triggered and sustained (2 min) changes in neck chamber pressure. High-fit subjects tended to have lower LBNP tolerance than mid- and low-fit subjects but similar baroreflex responses. Subjects with poor LBNP tolerance had larger stroke volumes (SV) (120 +/- 6 vs. 103 +/- 3 ml) and greater decline in SV with LBNP to -40 mmHg (40 +/- 2 vs. 26 +/- 4%). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that Gmax and steady-state gain of the carotid baroreflex contributed significantly toward explaining interindividual variations in LBNP tolerance. Thus endurance athletes may have decreased LBNP tolerance, but apparently not as a simple linear function of aerobic fitness. Orthostatic tolerance depends on complex interactions among functional characteristics that appear both related (Gmax and SV) and unrelated (baroreflex function) to fitness or exercise training.
A new approach to the study of arterial baroreflexes was developed for use during the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Spacelab Life Sciences-1 Space Shuttle mission. This method holds promise as a means to characterize the vagal limb of human baroreflex responses comprehensively and efficiently.
Variations in respiratory pattern influence the heart rate spectrum. It has been suggested, hence, that metronomic respiration should be used to correctly assess vagal modulation of heart rate by using spectral analysis. On the other hand, breathing to a metronome has been reported to increase heart rate spectral power in the high- or respiratory frequency region; this finding has led to the suggestion that metronomic respiration enhances vagal tone or alters vagal modulation of heart rate. To investigate whether metronomic breathing complicates the interpretation of heart rate spectra by altering vagal modulation, we recorded the electrocardiogram and respiration from eight volunteers during three breathing trials of 10 min each: 1) spontaneous breathing (mean rate of 14.4 breaths/min); 2) breathing to a metronome at the rate of 15, 18, and 21 breaths/min for 2, 6, and 2 min, respectively; and 3) breathing to a metronome at the rate of 18 breaths/min for 10 min. Data were also collected from eight volunteers who breathed spontaneously for 20 min and breathed metronomically at each subject's mean spontaneous breathing frequency for 20 min. Results from the three 10-min breathing trials showed that heart rate power in the respiratory frequency region was smaller during metronomic breathing than during spontaneous breathing. This decrease could be explained fully by the higher breathing frequencies used during trials 2 and 3 of metronomic breathing. When the subjects breathed metronomically at each subject's mean breathing frequency, the heart rate powers during metronomic breathing were similar to those during spontaneous breathing. Our results suggest that vagal modulation of heart rate is not altered and vagal tone is not enhanced during metronomic breathing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.