Mice develop pulmonary emphysema after chronic exposure to cigarette smoke (CS). In this study, the influence of gender, exposure duration, and concentration of CS on emphysema, pulmonary function, inflammation, markers of toxicity, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity was examined in A/J mice. Mice were exposed to CS at either 100 or 250 mg total particulate material/m 3 (CS-100 or CS-250, respectively) for 10, 16, or 22 weeks. Evidence of emphysema was first seen in female mice after 10 weeks of exposure to CS-250, while male mice did not develop emphysema until 16 weeks. Female mice exposed to CS-100 did not have emphysema until 16 weeks, suggesting that disease development depends on the concentration and duration of exposure. Airflow obstruction and increased pulmonary compliance were observed in mice exposed to CS-250 for 22 weeks. Decreased elasticity was likely the major contributor to airflow obstruction because substantial remodeling of the conducting airways, beyond mild mucous cell hyperplasia, was lacking. Exposure to CS increased the number of macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes (B cells and activated CD4-and CD8-positive T cells), and activity of MMP-2 and-9 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Treatment with antioxidants N-acetylcysteine or epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) did not decrease emphysema severity, but EGCG slightly decreased BALF inflammatory cell numbers and lactate dehydrogenase activity. Inflammation and emphysema persisted after a 17-week recovery period following exposure to CS-250 for 22 weeks. The similarities of this model to the human disease make it promising for studying disease pathogenesis and assessing new therapeutic interventions.
A past study demonstrated that all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) treatment by intraperitoneal injection in a rat model of elastase-induced emphysema caused tissue regeneration as evidenced by a decrease in alveolar size and lung volume and an increase in alveolar number. We postulated that treatment with this retinoid by nose-only inhalation exposure would be a more efficient means of targeting damaged lung tissue. Emphysema was induced in male Fischer 344 rats by intratracheal instillation of pancreatic elastase (0.5 IU/g body weight). Four weeks after elastase instillation, animals were treated once daily, 4 days/week, for 3 weeks by exposing them nose-only to aerosolized ATRA (target concentration-time of 3000 or 15,000 mg-min/m3) or by injecting them intraperitoneally with ATRA in cottonseed oil (0.5 or 2.5 mg/kg). Based on estimates of particle deposition in the respiratory tract, inhalation doses were chosen to be consistent with injected doses. Lungs were fixed by inflation with formalin (constant pressure for 6 hours followed by >48 hours of immersion) and were embedded in paraffin. Sections were evaluated by histopathology and stereology. Inhalation exposure to ATRA at both aerosol concentrations caused significant elevations of ATRA in the lung, whereas only the high-dose injection treatment was associated with an elevation of lung ATRA. The mean ATRA concentration from lungs of rats in the high-dose inhalation exposure groups as measured by liquid chromatography--mass spectrometry was approximately 12-fold greater than that of high-dose injection-treated rats. Elastase instillation caused increased lung volumes, irregular alveolar air space enlargement, and fragmentation and attenuation of alveolar septa. Neither inhaled nor injected ATRA reduced the enlarged lung volumes associated with this emphysema model. Stereology demonstrated that alveolar air space enlargement in ATRA-treated rats was similar to that in sham-treated emphysematous animals. Thus, while inhalation treatment caused greater levels of the drug in lung tissue in comparison to that of injection-treated animals, treatment with ATRA by either route of administration did not cause a reversal of lung tissue damage in this model of elastase-induced emphysema.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.