Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) was formed~7500 years ago by hybridization between B. rapa and B. oleracea, followed by chromosome doubling, a process known as allopolyploidy. Together with more ancient polyploidizations, this conferred an aggregate 72× genome multiplication since the origin of angiosperms and high gene content. We examined the B. napus genome and the consequences of its recent duplication. The constituent A n and C n subgenomes are engaged in subtle structural, functional, and epigenetic cross-talk, with abundant homeologous exchanges. Incipient gene loss and expression divergence have begun. Selection in B. napus oilseed types has accelerated the loss of glucosinolate genes, while preserving expansion of oil biosynthesis genes. These processes provide insights into allopolyploid evolution and its relationship with crop domestication and improvement.T he Brassicaceae are a large eudicot family (1) and include the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Brassicas have a propensity for genome duplications ( Fig. 1) and genome mergers (2). They are major contributors to the human diet and were among the earliest cultigens (3).B. napus (genome A n A n C n C n ) was formed by recent allopolyploidy between ancestors of B. oleracea (Mediterranean cabbage, genome C o C o ) and B. rapa (Asian cabbage or turnip, genome A r A r ) and is polyphyletic (2, 4), with spontaneous formation regarded by Darwin as an example of unconscious selection (5). Cultivation began in Europe during the Middle Ages and spread worldwide. Diversifying selection gave rise to oilseed rape (canola), rutabaga, fodder rape, and kale morphotypes grown for oil, fodder, and food (4, 6).The homozygous B. napus genome of European winter oilseed cultivar 'Darmor-bzh' was assembled with long-read [>700 base pairs (bp)] 454 GS-FLX+ Titanium (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and Sanger sequence (tables S1 to S5 and figs. S1 to S3) (7). Correction and gap filling used 79 Gb of Illumina (San Diego, CA) HiSeq sequence. A final assembly of 849.7 Mb was obtained with SOAP (8) and Newbler (Roche), with 89% nongapped sequence (tables S2 and S3). Unique mapping of 5× nonassembled 454 sequences from B. rapa ('Chiifu') or B. oleracea (' TO1000') assigned most of the 20,702 B. napus scaffolds to either the A n (8294) or the C n (9984) subgenomes (tables S4 and S5 and fig. S3). The assembly covers~79% of the 1130-Mb genome and includes 95.6% of Brassica expressed sequence tags (ESTs) (7). A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) map (tables S6 to S9 and figs. S4 to S8) genetically anchored 712.3 Mb (84%) of the genome assembly, yielding pseudomolecules for the 19 chromosomes (table S10).The assembled C n subgenome (525.8 Mb) is larger than the A n subgenome (314.2 Mb), consistent with the relative sizes of the assembled C o genome of B. oleracea (540 Mb, 85% of thẽ 630-Mb genome) and the A r genome of B. rapa (312 Mb, 59% of the~530-Mb genome) (9-11). The B. napus assembly contains 34.8% transposable elements (TEs), less than the 40% estimated from raw reads (table...

An annotated reference sequence representing the hexaploid bread wheat genome in 21 pseudomolecules has been analyzed to identify the distribution and genomic context of coding and noncoding elements across the A, B, and D subgenomes. With an estimated coverage of 94% of the genome and containing 107,891 high-confidence gene models, this assembly enabled the discovery of tissue- and developmental stage–related coexpression networks by providing a transcriptome atlas representing major stages of wheat development. Dynamics of complex gene families involved in environmental adaptation and end-use quality were revealed at subgenome resolution and contextualized to known agronomic single-gene or quantitative trait loci. This community resource establishes the foundation for accelerating wheat research and application through improved understanding of wheat biology and genomics-assisted breeding.

1 I. Introduction 2 II. Measurement and imaging of H O 2 III. H O and O toxicity 3 IV. Production of H O : enzymes and subcellular locations 4 V. H O transport 9 VI. Control of H O concentration: how and where? 9 VII. Metabolic functions of H O 11 VIII. H O signalling 11 IX. Where next? 13 Acknowledgements 13 References 13 SUMMARY: Hydrogen peroxide (H O ) is produced, via superoxide and superoxide dismutase, by electron transport in chloroplasts and mitochondria, plasma membrane NADPH oxidases, peroxisomal oxidases, type III peroxidases and other apoplastic oxidases. Intracellular transport is facilitated by aquaporins and H O is removed by catalase, peroxiredoxin, glutathione peroxidase-like enzymes and ascorbate peroxidase, all of which have cell compartment-specific isoforms. Apoplastic H O influences cell expansion, development and defence by its involvement in type III peroxidase-mediated polymer cross-linking, lignification and, possibly, cell expansion via H O -derived hydroxyl radicals. Excess H O triggers chloroplast and peroxisome autophagy and programmed cell death. The role of H O in signalling, for example during acclimation to stress and pathogen defence, has received much attention, but the signal transduction mechanisms are poorly defined. H O oxidizes specific cysteine residues of target proteins to the sulfenic acid form and, similar to other organisms, this modification could initiate thiol-based redox relays and modify target enzymes, receptor kinases and transcription factors. Quantification of the sources and sinks of H O is being improved by the spatial and temporal resolution of genetically encoded H O sensors, such as HyPer and roGFP2-Orp1. These H O sensors, combined with the detection of specific proteins modified by H O , will allow a deeper understanding of its signalling roles.

Stomata play an important role in plant innate immunity by limiting pathogen entry into leaves but molecular mechanisms regulating stomatal closure upon pathogen perception are not well understood. Here we show that the Arabidopsis thaliana L-type lectin receptor kinase-V.5 (LecRK-V.5) negatively regulates stomatal immunity. Loss of LecRK-V.5 function increased resistance to surface inoculation with virulent bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000. Levels of resistance were not affected after infiltration-inoculation, suggesting that LecRK-V.5 functions at an early defense stage. By contrast, lines overexpressing LecRK-V.5 were more susceptible to Pst DC3000. Enhanced resistance in lecrk-V.5 mutants was correlated with constitutive stomatal closure, while increased susceptibility phenotypes in overexpression lines were associated with early stomatal reopening. Lines overexpressing LecRK-V.5 also demonstrated a defective stomatal closure after pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) treatments. LecRK-V.5 is rapidly expressed in stomatal guard cells after bacterial inoculation or treatment with the bacterial PAMP flagellin. In addition, lecrk-V.5 mutants guard cells exhibited constitutive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inhibition of ROS production opened stomata of lecrk-V.5. LecRK-V.5 is also shown to interfere with abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure signaling upstream of ROS production. These results provide genetic evidences that LecRK-V.5 negatively regulates stomatal immunity upstream of ROS biosynthesis. Our data reveal that plants have evolved mechanisms to reverse bacteria-mediated stomatal closure to prevent long-term effect on CO2 uptake and photosynthesis.

In Eukaryotes, LIM proteins act as developmental regulators in basic cellular processes such as regulating the transcription or organizing the cytoskeleton. The LIM domain protein family in plants has mainly been studied in sunflower and tobacco plants, where several of its members exhibit a specific pattern of expression in pollen. In this paper, we finely characterized in poplar six transcripts encoding these proteins. In Populus trichocarpa genome, the 12 LIM gene models identified all appear to be duplicated genes. In addition, we describe several new LIM domain proteins deduced from Arabidopsis and rice genomes, raising the number of LIM gene models to six for both species. Plant LIM genes have a core structure of four introns with highly conserved coding regions. We also identified new LIM domain proteins in several other species, and a phylogenetic analysis of plant LIM proteins reveals that they have undergone one or several duplication events during the evolution. We gathered several LIM protein members within new monophyletic groups. We propose to classify the plant LIM proteins into four groups: αLIM1, βLIM1, γLIM2, and δLIM2, subdivided according to their specificity to a taxonomic class and/or to their tissue-specific expression. Our investigation of the structure of the LIM domain proteins revealed that they contain many conserved motifs potentially involved in their function.